Meeting minutes
<william-vw> Ha!
omg
Approval of the minutes from two weeks ago 1
<pfps> minutes look acceptable to me
<ora> PROPOSAL: Approve minutes of 2026-04-30
<gtw> +1
<Dominik_T> +0 (not present)
<niklasl> +1
<william-vw> +1
<ktk> +0 (not available)
<AndyS> +1
<tl> +1
<ora> +1
<pchampin> +0 (I was not there)
<pfps> +1
<TallTed> +1
RESOLUTION: Approve minutes of 2026-04-30
Informal discussions last week 2
andyS: we had a good discussion on RDF/XML, difficult problem, but envisioned solution seems to work
ktk: should we reserve bi-weekly meetings for discussions like we did in the past?
andys: support this idea
ora: maybe recurring agenda item
TPAC & ISWC 2026 3 4
ktk: will be discussed in next chair meeting, proposal forthcoming
<pfps> Although I wouldn't be going to TPAC in any case, the timing stinks!
ktk: TPAC same date as ISWC
… almost the same time zone. maybe have a joined virtual session
ora: i will be at ISWC
pchampin: will be at TPAC which is a good place to have working group meetings. observers in dublin might be interested
… might be a good opportunity to get more people in
ora: try to get a joined meeting on the ISWC agenda
… program committee is not visible on the website. will email chairs
andys: TPAC general plenary is on wednesday which would be bad for telco
ACTION: ora to email the ISWC organizers
<gb> Created action #190
Review of open PRs, available at 5
<niklasl> This one: w3c/
<gb> Pull Request 16 fix error when generating doc with Respec 37.0 (by pchampin)
<AndyS> w3c/
pchampin: will merge pr
ora: 327 review needed
andys: and fixes as well
ora: a lot of dark mode issues, little of "substance"
… not a complaint!
ktk: do we get towards the end, or is there some stuff hidden somewhere?
andys: still a lot of sparql errata
ora: anything we can do to help?
pchampin: we are not entirely done with the TAG discussion. i'm working on a PR to document the discussion
<niklasl> w3c/
<gb> Issue 189 Consolidate advice about versions of RDF syntax and HTTP access (by niklasl) [needs discussion] [ms:CR]
niklas: there is an issue about versions that still needs work
<pchampin> +1 thanks, will report on that issue
ktk: mailing list follow up needed?
… andy just replied today
Identifying issues to solve before CR 6
pchampin: 98% passing sparql implementation in sophia, ready to submit an implementation report
<ktk> s/implementatuion/implementation/
pchampin: will very soon be available on github
… i received an email from graphwise, complaining that the test suite doesn't include the version - so they are looking at the test suite
… they opened an issue a few days ago
<pchampin> w3c/
Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting
ktk: seems like oracle is working on a 1.2 implementation
… on qlever it is not prioritized
andys: tentris will probably follow as well
… jena supports it in 6.1 release
tallted: latest internal builds of Virtuoso passed all tests as of a few weeks ago. I don't know whether that's reflected in currently available downloads.
andys: oxigraph did it, comunica as well
ora: will follow up with stardog
andys: rdflib are working on it
… rubyrdf has 1.2 stuff in it
ktk: KGC had good presentations, interesting questions
<ktk> s/implementatuion/implementation/