Meeting minutes
Agenda Review & Announcements
matatk: Janina changed affiliation so can not continue as a Chair of APA
janina: I will be joining LevelAccess so need to go through W3C before I continue with APA
Roy_Ruoxi: I will have to reappoint Janina after approval from W3C team
Jennifer: I am now with Govermnet of Maryland
Jennifer: I will see you at CSUN
Congratulations to Janina and Jennifer
<Fredrik> One sees one at CSUN?
<tsaulter> Will be at my first CSUN this year
Spec review requests
New on TR
SHACL 1.2 Node Expressions
ISSUE: w3c/
<Roy_Ruoxi> spec: https://
<matatk> SHACL 1.2 UI: https://
matatk: I think this is pretty low level, but if it is related to SHACL user interface then it should be checked for accessibility
Fredrik: I think I should continue with the chain of SHACL
matatk: I will have a light reading of it
Spec review requests
CSS Anchor Positioning
<matatk> w3c/
<matatk> APA thread: w3c/
Eric: Is there any other method I should follow to work on this then please let me know
matatk: me, Eric and Paul are working on this
matatk: Neha added some examples
matatk: We can definitely build a draft from what we have build till now
Eric_hind: I am still working on it
janina: Have we considered COGA's comments?
Eric_hind: Yes, we have considered
janina: We can have a meeting with Lisa and Julie regarding this
DVB Accessibility Implementation Guidelines
<matatk> w3c/
matatk: Janina, Fredrik, Tiffiny and I are on it, but nothing to specify or nothing is missing
janina: We are pulled in late but we can have a look and check what ius missing , but it is well written , still confusing where are we in this?
matatk: Do you have any concern regarding any thing?
janina: It is related to appropriate language which is from Europe
matatk: It is a good pointlet us do this async and come up with APA comments
janina: Lety us ask Tiffiny and Fredrik have anything to say
Tiffany: A way to track the progress of the document
Issue tracking
Spec: Scroll Triggered Animations #272, COGA, disorientation considerations
<matatk> w3c/
Eric_hind: It is not related to spec but more general
Eric_hind: Scroll triggered animation
Eric_hind: If animations are triggered by hovering or by other events that the user might not anticipate will trigger an animation, the user can become confused and disoriented.
matatk: One thing we are missing is a link to a request
<matatk> Link to tracking issue for the spec: w3c/
matatk: This was proposed to TAG spec related to design
matatk: One thing to mention to ask to add Accessibility related section
matatk: CSS animation is a good place to put it
janina: is the use of media query not sufficient to answer this?
Spec: Scroll Triggered Animations #272, Request additional definitions on term 'animation'
<matatk> w3c/
Spec: Scroll Triggered Animations #272, Additional considerations when drafting accessibility considerations section
<matatk> w3c/
Eric_hind: how Animation can harm users with vestibular disorders
matatk: In this case we want to know we these cases have been considered or not
matatk: I will go through TAG spec and check if all these issues which we are discussing are alreadyt considered or not
<JenStrickland> I'm out of spoons this week and unable to support this one, even though it's right in my interest area.
Spec: Scroll Triggered Animations #272, Request additional definitions on term 'animation'
<matatk> w3c/
Eric_hind: it is about Animation definition
Eric_hind: only visuals, adding audio or not, so adding definition will help
matatk: In terms of process not sure, but this is really good, but I have a query to ask
<matatk> matatk: I was thinking about this too: https://
matatk: it is about what is missing on web platform
matatk: there is not unique definition to what is motion and not defined way to stop the motion
matatk: Some UA work will be required to solve this
Spec: Scroll Triggered Animations #272, COGA, users often need more time impacts content type
<matatk> w3c/
Eric_hind: consideration of users who need more time while using animation
JenStrickland: We should explicitly mention to CSS regarding marking animation as decorative
janina: time out is also a problem which should be handled as per WCAG SC