Meeting minutes
<jsahleen> JcK present+
Agenda Review
joel: discussion about new charter, message from xfq on tracker issues on HTML ruby extension
r12a: discussion with WCAG colleagues
Action Items
<jsahleen> #200
<gb> Action 200 produce a new charter draft (on xfq) due 2025-12-11
<addison> https://
<jsahleen> #197
<gb> Action 197 rename the repo and shortname and publish ruby accessibility document as a first draft note (on xfq, himorin) due 2025-11-18
joel: xfq drafted charter, and florian gave comment
<jsahleen> #196
<gb> Action 196 remind @duerst to create a list of gaps in URL standard (on aphillips, duerst) due 2025-11-17
atsushi: still following up discussions during TPAC which I could not attend per conflict, will jump in shortly
<jsahleen> #189
addison: will ping on 196
<gb> Action 189 follow up with shane carr about ecma repo automation (on aphillips) due 2025-10-23
<jsahleen> #187
<gb> Action 187 ping GOOG again for participation (on aphillips) due 2025-10-16
addison: will ping on 189
addison: on 187, emailing to Mark
<jsahleen> #185
<gb> Action 185 follow up with PLH on automating TC39 repos (on aphillips) due 2025-10-02
Info Share
joel: remainings seem stalling, skip
[no additional info share]
Review RADAR Review
<addison> https://
joel: no new incoming
[no update on in review]
addison: any update on awaiting comment resolution?
<xfq> https://
xfq: above issues resolved
Pending Issue Review
<jsahleen> i18n-activity/#2049
#2049
<gb> Issue 2049 not found
<jsahleen> i18n/activity #2049
<gb> Issue 2049 UX Review: 2.18 Web typography must be highly optimized and appropriate (by w3cbot) [pending] [close?] [tracker] [s:web-sustainability-guidelines] [ig:sustainableweb]
<addison> https://
joel: web typography issue in web sastinability, reopened this?
<jsahleen> w3c/i18n-activity#2047
<gb> Issue 2047 Native Footnote/Endnote Element in HTML (by w3cbot) [pending] [tracker] [s:html] [whatwg]
r12a: commented on this issue, and which is added to agenda by me
xfq: we are having discussion on 2047, keep remained
<jsahleen> w3c/i18n-activity#2055
<gb> CLOSED Issue 2055 Alternative to the explicit base direction setting? (by w3cbot) [close?] [tracker] [s:epub] [wg:pm]
joel: base direction setting one, do we have any open point here?
addison: discussed and closing tracker
<jsahleen> w3c/i18n-activity#2045
<gb> Issue 2045 Findability, copyability (by w3cbot) [close?] [tracker] [i:inline_notes] [spec-type-issue] [jlreq] [clreq] [mlreq] [t:char_sort] [t:typ_ruby] [s:html-ruby-extensions] [wg:htmlwg]
Review draft charter
<xfq> https://
xfq: URL above
xfq: discussed with PLH on this issue, bring this for AC to review
… if people want to change on IG, we will
[xfq show draft charter via screen sharing]
xfq: added message resources as tentative following comment
… rec-track deliverables need testing strategy
… also added some text in WG coordination part, to mention our coorporation with WHATWG and ARIA WG
addison: would have glossary first for deliverables
… additional items, like ltli or timezone document
… need to be discussed
<xfq> https://
addison: need to think about which we would list as normative deliverables
addison: some would be listed as non-normative deliverables
xfq: will check and add
[background and condition to be listed in charter]
ACTION: xfq: make list of currently-non-REC deliverables for consideration of REC-track
<gb> Created action #201
xfq: couple of items to do, including coordinations
xfq: gap-analysis documents?
<xfq> https://
addison: might be interested to list all of these documents, although
<jsahleen> Having a list would be useful for me too
xfq: our project rader lists these
AOB?
Review draft charter
HTML Ruby extension issues
xfq: here is link, two open tracker issues
<xfq> w3c/
<gb> Issue 1865 Describe cases where jukugo ruby is not like group ruby (by r12a) [close?] [i:inline_notes] [jlreq] [clreq] [mlreq] [needs-resolution] [s:html-ruby-extensions] [wg:htmlwg] [script-jpan]
xfq: raised by r12a and florian closed WG issue
<xfq> https://
xfq: one is 1865 for adjusting ruby
[agreed to close]
<jsahleen> w3c/
<gb> Issue 1863 Add rb>rt>rb>rt example code to Example 1 (by r12a) [close?] [i:inline_notes] [jlreq] [clreq] [mlreq] [needs-resolution] [s:html-ruby-extensions] [wg:htmlwg] [script-jpan]
<xfq> https://
<gb> MERGED Pull Request 26 Adjust example 1 in response to i18n review feedback (by frivoal) [Closed: Addressed] [Decision by: Editor's jugement] [Tests: Unneeded] [Type: Editorial] [Topic: Ruby Markup spec]
Proposal: 2.18 Web typography
<r12a> https://
<r12a> w3c/
<gb> CLOSED Issue 147 Proposal: 2.18 Web typography must be highly optimized and appropriate (by ehorrell) [taskforce-ux]
r12a: isuse closed once, but I've pushed back with commenting there
… first, there was no i18n label, could xfq ask PLH for adding standard labels?
r12a: what they are saying is based on latain languages
addison: agree that dynamic content or user input would suffer difficulty
<xfq> https://
<xfq> https://
[font loading/downloading issues shared]
addison: still wondering how font subsetting works well, subsetting generation needs care
xfq: will check repository for labeling automation
addison: our interest would be written success criteria, on font advice
<xfq> it's not in https://
<xfq> https://
[watching TPAC video]
<jsahleen> Fuqiao should do all our public speaking from now on.