Meeting minutes
Accept the minutes of the previous meeting
[Accepted]
Review of open actions
Norm: The ones marked completed are done
Status reports
Norm: I implemented numbered repetitions, and two versions of modularity.
… both operate in the same way
Steven: We should look at alternative syntaxes as well. I liked Nico's, though not unambiguous, so needs fixing
Steven: I'd like to see Liam's proposal
New open issues
+ #332 Invisible XML media type
Steven: vnd matches our case
Norm: Wait to see whether W3C situation will allow us to get application/
Steven: I also asked whether we want to use it to kick off the ixml process.
John: It is analogous to xslt
David: Are there examples of processors using parameters like this?
Norm: Can't think of one
+ #329 Unicode version not referenced in the spec
Norm: We do say there is no requirement on the version of Unicode
Steven: We did agree not to require any particular version
Norm: Let's update to 17, and add prose that repeats we have no requirement on a version
ACTION: Steven to draft prose on Unicode version
+ #330 XML Namespace not referenced in iXML
Norm: Let's add a ref to the namespaces rec
ACTION: Norm draft prose for namespaces reference
+ #310 Not possible to set priority on rules
Norm: Not new, now a part of ambiguity topic
First Int’l Symposium on Invisible XML
Steven: Eight submissions so far
Norm: I have created a private repository for submissions
Steven: The Zoom licence I can use looks like it is sufficient for us.
Norm: Registrations?
Steven: Just publish the URL and let people come
John: Still meeting the 16th to look at the submissions
Norm: Yes, at the same time as usual
Ambiguity umbrella topic
Norm: Topic made. What are we going to do?
Steven: The two approaches are 1) let there be ambiguity, and I'll pick one; 2) No ambiguity, handle it in the parser.
Norm: There are two types of ambiguity.
… I'd like to see a document.
ACTION: Steven create a discussion document on ambiguity.
Perspectives on serialization
Steven: Merge.
Next meeting
Steven: Skip the 9th, and next meeting is the 16th
… next after that will be 6th January
AOB
David: Is there any prep for the 16th?
Norm: If there are more than 50, we will have to decide, and we can also account for how much time.
[ADJOURN]