Meeting minutes
Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura, Mahda_Noura, Luca_Barbato
Minutes
https://
ek: any remarks?
lb: looks good
ek: approved
… I am making a PR for the wot repo with html minutes
Toolchain Updates
mn: they also have a runtime. linkml-runtime generates the linkml documentation. Eat your own dogfood
… now they are working on merging the both repositories
… i.e. linkml and linkml-runtime
… in the meantime, I started learning about their testing runtime
… I talked to a colleague in Siemens, Silvano, who works on this too
additionalProperties modelling
w3c/
… I was doing some post processing to add additionalProperties
… it depends on the linkml-runtime
… this is tracked in linkml/
Multilanguage Support
… this is tracked in linkml/linkml#2896
ek: do we have the same feature in the json-ld context
mn: yes it is in our context as well
<Zakim> dape, you wanted to https://
dp: we have titles and title and it looks different to the example in linkml
… who is behaving badly?
https://
mn: the default language in TD terms is english
<dape> https://
dp: is our title going to be object based on this ?
ca: we decided to keep it a string for now
… this way we support json only parsers
<Zakim> dape, you wanted to https://
ek: should we add anything to our multilanguage examples? Like in the linkml example?
mn: no since our json-ld context already explains it
PR 2900 in LinkML
mn: this got merged so I get to remove a post processing script
… this is a nice progress I am seeing
our repo
mn: I need to fix the ontology generators
… also I managed to back into the repo
… I did some cleanups
… also the document generation
… I have copied over the index.template.html
… we have the placeholder indicated by %s
… I create jinja template and now focusing on the Thing class
… (shows the local index.html)
… the table section now gets auto generated
https://
mn: we need to handle the atrisk stuff too
ek: also we need unique ids for assertions
mn: and I need to go into the shacl shapes too
ek: yes I hate that we need to edit that file at the same time
mn: also the ontology and spec have different values for descriptions
ca: not sure why we have a discrepency but indeed we should not have this
ek: also good to see that the linkml community is active
mn: yes indeed. however, I would need to provide a fix the rdf generator as it doesn't seem to be a high prio for them
mn: we can keep a fork and use that for the spec as well. What do you think?
ek: we should contribute upstream