Meeting minutes
<janina> date 15 Oct 2025
<Mike3> Present
1.3
1.3
Jason: Move "While overlays..." to be the closing sentence of the paragraph
Lionel_Wolberger: Check the <ul> list markup, as we should get two number 1. and 2.
Jason: Move "We cross-reference the internationally accepted WCAG..." to the next section
Section 1.4
Lionel_Wolberger: Suggest the three headings to be 1.2 Post-Source and "Edge".... 1.3 Post-source and Overlays 1.4 Post-Source and WCAG
Jason: Suggest removing, "Our focus is user-centered and outcome-driven. "
… this is redundant with the next sentence
Jason: The sentence we deleted from 1.3, "We cross-reference the internationally accepted WCAG Success Criteria throughout our publication because they remain valid whether applied in source or post-source."
… add it as the close of 1.4
Jason: Try this, "Accessibility is user-centered and outcome-driven."
Lionel_Wolberger: Move the sentence closing 1.3, to close 1.4
Jason: Can move "The wide range of specific web accessibility outcomes sought in this document can be accomplished through the application of appropriate post-source methods. without recourse to additional UI elements such as pop-up control panels or accessibility widgets." up into scope
Lionel_Wolberger: It can be C. following A. and B. in scope
… after 'initially'
1.5
Lionel_Wolberger: We can update the Web Almanac to a more recent year
janina: We'll need the new numbers and the new link
Lionel_Wolberger: Move "In the main,".... to be in the white space after 1. Introduction and before 1.1 scope
… change "Note" to read Post-Source and Privacy
Blue colored formatting
Lionel_Wolberger" WCAG Reference Cross references to the WCAG specification
… the word "Cross Refernces" is blue colored. check that the markup is terminated properly
Find the announcement paragraph
janina: I will look for it.
Anticipating Reactions
janina: People will say, "in theory sounds great... they will ask for demonstrations
Jason: We could contribute to the Knowbility AIR event next year
… https://
Chris: People may give feedback to this document, even while their signature appears on the 'fact sheet'
… I do hope people will read the entire document, I am concerned that people will read only portions
… we will need to react with 'what makes you say that', asking them to account for their reactions