Meeting minutes
New Business
Fazio: want to try and get the Call for Consensus out by next week so it is out for TPAC
Fazio: Kevin has converted his email into issues
Fazio: some have already been discussed, others need to be addressed before we can do a call for consensus
fazio: This is a follow up issue from Jason
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 226 Add an explanatory section on dimension goals and metrics (by jasonjgw)
Fazio: discussed ticket, this overlaps with one of Kevin's issue
sheri: this seems like a big change, changing culture to Governance and oversite
Oversight missing · Issue #348 · w3c/maturity-model
Janina: What is missing from Oversign and Culture
<gb> Issue 348 Oversight missing (by iadawn)
<gb> Issue 341 Missing governance/policy (by iadawn)
Janina: could rename it to oversight and governance
Sheri: does Culture fit into Oversite and Governance?
David: no, culture is throughout the other dimensions.
Sheri: oversite requires governance.
… how to create policies etc.
Janina: we should combine Jason and Kevin's issues
Sheri: I can put some things together and have this for next week.
Sheri_BH: volunteered to draft extra content for that dimension
Sheri_BH: the name should just be governance, as governance inherently requires oversight
Jeff: financial commitment.
David: this is the main issue we need to address prior to CFC.
Sheri_BH: Review culture, reviewed section, we can sub in edited version from Jeff.
Jeff: what do we need to do?
janina: Sheri will mock something up.
Jeff: we have 1 bullet item in a global location like what I drafted?
Sheri_BH: Yes, an over all goal section with this new Governance section.
… we can edit it in a google doc then add it to our document.
Jeff: a top section of document, and we leave the dimensions alone.
Sheri_BH: if we abstract it out...
jeff: we leave the line item in each dimension alone, and we create something overall
Sheri_BH: I disagree with abstracting it out, then it isn't part of the scoring process
I do agree with putting it in Governance
Jeff: I think its odd, but will defer to the team.
Sheri_BH: I will throw together a google doc and send out a link by Friday for review/editing
Jeff: We are going to rename Culture to "Governance"
GitHub Issue #226 Add an explanatory section on dimension goals and metrics
GitHub Issue #298 ICT is not widely known - definition doesn't really help
<gb> Issue 298 ICT is not widely known - definition doesn't really help (by clapierre)
https://
Charles: this new addition is fine.
Sheri_BH: my addition to 1.1.1 solves 298, we have one typo and a line that needs to be added about adding dimensions like equity and sustainability
zakin, next item
<gb> Issue 303 Governance and Strategy Gap (by Helixopp)
Neha: will merge all three (226, 303, 348). The surviving ticket will be 348, and Sheri will draft language and circulate to address
Github Issue #303 Governance and Strategy Gap
Triage Remaining Issues
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 328 Clarify what model can do in abstract (by iadawn)
fazio: read his proposed edits out loud
group: Agrees this is good.
<gb> Issue 329 "Proof points" position in hierarchy (by iadawn)
Fazio: will grab the comment from the closed issue (the one Fazio entered for Kevin) and transfer it into 329 and close it
<gb> Issue 330 Use sentence case (by iadawn)
Neha: will make any editorial change requests
issue can be closed
<gb> Issue 331 "Proof points" language unclear (by iadawn)
this is addressed by the new 1.1.1 language
issue can be closed, once Fazio puts in the hyperlink to the new 1.1.1 language
<gb> Issue 332 Move research and standards review to explainer (by iadawn)
Fazio: This is a non-normative note, we are unaware that notes have explainers
issue can be closed
<gb> Issue 333 Definitions format (by iadawn)
Fazio: to ask Kevin which ones he thinks are problematic.
<gb> Issue 334 Improve the About section (by iadawn)
needs to be merged with 328
and then closed
Neha: to take care of these actions
<gb> Issue 335 Clarify impact on product deliver (by iadawn)
need to ask for more details. I don't want to misinterpret what they mean by this comment
Fazio: to ask for more details
<gb> Issue 347 Gaming the system (by iadawn)
This is a non-normative document.
janina: anything can be gamed, if people are going to be disingenuous, they are going to be disingenuous.
Fazio: The point isn't to get a score, it is to get a bird's eye view on what can be improved
Fazio: to close after including our comments