Meeting minutes
Phase 2 Subgroup Reports
<nicholascar> Profiling doc stub: https://
ajnelson-nist: Linking to upstream SHACL, how it ties in with The Profiles Vocabulary, OWL
nicholascar: Overview of SHACL profile now captured in profiles doc stub
… profiles of SHACL (not simple) and profiling with SHACL (simple)
… will write up the scope of these two sections in SHACL profiling
… moving meetings to Thursdays instead of Fridays
AndyS: Providing an update to the Rules subgroup.
… partial draft, looking at general rules rather than ad-hoc rules
… may have an editors meeting, potentially a WG taskforce so it shows up in the calendar
nicholascar: we should create taskforces for all of the subgroups
<TallTed> +1 make these official task forces
<TallTed> +1 minutes highly desirable
nicholascar: compact syntax subgroup organising meetings about now
Voting on Validation Report Issue #453
bergos: the vote is still open till Wednesday
… still some discussion on-going around the predicate
… *around the predicate naming
Total SHACL Namespaces
AndyS: keep discussions and listing of namespaces in the issue for now and address them later
nicholascar: Call for patents have now been sent
AndyS: where are we for horizontal review prior to CR
nicholascar: no progress yet - on me, elianaP and caribou
caribou: is there an explainer?
<caribou> https://
TallTed: no need to write an explainer, just point to the relevant sections
nicholascar: question for HolgerK, your recent writings for SHACL 1.2 overviews in LinkedIn, are you willing to contribute to the overview docs?
HolgerK: happy for nicholascar to pull parts out of the LinkedIn posts into the overview docs
… a couple of things like constraint types missing in the article but should be mentioned too
AndyS: is there coordination with the RDF WG? The SHACL docs will reference the normative sections.
… RDF documents likely to be in CR for quite a long time