W3C

– DRAFT –
Equity CG 2025 August 4

04 August 2025

Attendees

Present
beckett, CyberDetectives, JenStrickland, tzviya
Regrets
-
Chair
JenStrickland
Scribe
beckett

Meeting minutes

<CyberDetectives> +

Discussed following topics:

- To decide whether Benjamin's ongoing document contains relevant information for extraction, noting that it has been taken down from the Section 508 gov website under DEI backlash orders

- Introduced CyberDetectives to the group at the GitHub repo

- Next steps are to extract the useful bits from all of our lit review

*and the

Up for discussion how we want to format the condensing of the lit review

Proposed idea for format: Let all comment on and provide extra insights for the lit review (e.g. what resonates particularly strongly? what would be good to include in an equity framework? is there anything missing?), then after can create a condensed 'key takeaways' of each doc to present in a more visual and/or bitesize format

Agreed to send out a communication to lapsed members or members who might have been put off by lit review task to ask for input and comments during the next phase

Open question: How can we / should we map insight and takeaways from literature to the dimensions of organisational maturity?

We may need to adjust or add some dimensions from the accessibility version

Existing dimensions: communications, knowledge and skills, support, ICT development lifecycle, personnel, procurement, culture

Should we present these as dimensions weaving together rather than as fully separate categories?

All the MITRE notes are in the doc now

Maybe a spreadsheet or Miro could help organise condensed points against tabs of each of the maturity dimensions

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 244 (Thu Feb 27 01:23:09 2025 UTC).

Diagnostics

No scribenick or scribe found. Guessed: beckett

Active on IRC: beckett, CyberDetectives, JenStrickland, tzviya