Meeting minutes
Agenda Review, Membership & Announcements
Administrivia
matatk: Proposing to make status changes to the docs, now we've got at least most of the way with the PRs. Changes per email: https://
DRAFT RESOLUTION: Deprecate the Gap Analysis and Use Cases document at
<https: //www.w3.org/TR/pronunciation-gap-analysis-and-use-cases/>, and refer
instead to the separate Use Cases (at
<https: //www.w3.org/TR/pronunciation-use-cases/>), and Gap Analysis (at
<https: //www.w3.org/TR/pronunciation-gap-analysis/>), documents.
<matatk> +1
<PaulG> +1
<PaulG> +1
<IrfanA> +1
RESOLUTION: Deprecate the Gap Analysis and Use Cases document at <https://
DRAFT RESOLUTION: Deprecate the User Scenarios document at <https://
<matatk> +1
<IrfanA> +1
<PaulG> +1
<IrfanA> +1
RESOLUTION: Deprecate the User Scenarios document at <https://
<IrfanA> +1
matatk: *discusses next steps as per w3c/
<gb> Action 119 TF edits on use cases (on AutoSponge, matatk, alia11y)
PaulG: We could use Steve Faulkner's help on some of the upcoming stuff, e.g. introducing us to what and who we need to know to move the work on.
PaulG: Steve and Scott worked on ARIA in HTML
Combined use cases doc: https://
matatk: Any thoughts on this? We need to refocus it on user needs, not tech.
Alan: The document seems to act as if web speech supports SSML, which it doesn't to a large extent. We can't rely on that.
matatk: Could you check to see if the Gap Analysis - https://
Alan: SSML seemed to disappear when switching to Edge/Chromium.
PaulG: Whilst it's irksome for things like accessibility, the sum of the specs and patterns are aspirational and are meant to encourage support.
IrfanA: We have used google docs in the past; could do again.
IrfanA: Timelines?
matatk: ASAP :-). Would be good if by TPAC we have a community-reviewed set of use cases, and solid ideas on how to solve at least some of them.