W3C

– DRAFT –
WoT Use Cases

09 July 2025

Attendees

Present
Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
-
Chair
-
Scribe
McCool

Meeting minutes

Minutes

https://www.w3.org/2025/07/02-wot-uc-minutes.html

McCool: minutes look good, any objections?

Mizushima: no objections

McCool: approved

PRs

PR 368

McCool: https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/368, "Fixed typo ( Maintainter to Maintainer) in index.html"

Mizushima: this fixes a ReSpec issue by fixing the typo in "Maintainer"

McCool: (reviewed, merged)

McCool: (confirms problem was fixed)

Other

McCool: changes to stakeholders and security user stories still need to be updated; next week?

Issues

McCool: so lately I don't feel like changing the "use case" term; it will be a huge pain. It even changes the overall name of the document!
… I think what we really need to do is provide clear definitions of how WE use these terms.

McCool: also, I think section 1.1 is basically useless and we should just delete it.
… then 1.2.1 should define terms like use cases, etc.
… the doc links to architecture, which is fine for most things. But it does not define Use Case or User Story.

w3c/wot-usecases#369

w3c/wot-usecases#370

McCool: drafted a PR which addresses both these issues: w3c/wot-usecases#371

McCool: will not merge for now, need to fill in some blanks. I will assign myself to do that

McCool: adjourn

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 244 (Thu Feb 27 01:23:09 2025 UTC).