Meeting minutes
<Fazio> sheri_b-h present+
New Business
Fazio: wai leadership wants to stay updated with style guide, abstract and introduction updates, so every thing is on the track
CharlesL: Gave TPAC visit updates, mostly joining virtually
Github Issue #263 Change Culture Dimension To Oversight and Culture
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 263 Change Culture Dimension To Oversight and Culture (by Helixopp)
Fazio: It strarted from #244 There are currently no proof points related to fiscal aspects of implementing the maturity model. Without budget for the initiative, probability of success (full maturity ) is low
Fazio: we decided to change Culture Dimension To Oversight and Culture
Fazio: Proposed new "Oversight and Culture" dimension Proof point language:
Exception / risk acceptance process which includes justification, time limits, and executive approval in place for non-accessible digital assets developed, procured, or used by the organization.
Fazio: Resolved #255
Fazio: De we need separate proof points, Jeff?
Jeff: We need separate proof points
Jeff: They are also mentioned in #244
Fazio: we have sample language with issue #244 and #255
<Fazio> Should: "Financial planning in place and funding committed for advancing this dimension's proof points to full maturity (optimize stage)" go in Oversight or all dimensions
Jeff: Shall we add it in one place or add it as a separate proof points in each dimension
<SusiPallero> I think it should have a place on each dimension
Fazio: It should be inside Oversight
Jeff: Still thinking about it as it should not be missed by people
Dr_Keith: still unclear where it will fit as there is a very thin line
Fazio: Explained with the help of central fund vs department fund example
Jeff: Producment of a thing requires it to be present and it does not bother where it is but just want it to be covered
Fazio: We have only 2 Proof points in culture so we may be able to separate it
CharlesL: Originally I was with Dr_Keith that we should have it at one place and refer from there. Duplicating it in some dimensions may increase confusion.
JeffK: It may it missed if it placed at one place, so I dont know
Jeff: I guess an experienced person would be dealing with this so it won't confuse I suppose
Fazio: three options
1. Put it in all dimensions
2. Put it in Oversight
<Dr_Keith> Option 2 - Place in Oversight
3. Have a different version in Oversight
<CharlesL> I vote Option 2.
Neha: Option 1
<SusiPallero> Option 1 but I am ok with having 2 for now
<Fazio> option 2
<SusiPallero> I'm ok
Option 2 = 4
I am also okay
<Fazio> Oversight and Culture Proof Point language Financial planning in place and funding committed for advancing progress in all dimensions towards full maturity
<CharlesL> Attempting to have Jeff Kline rejoin IRC
jkline present+
Jeff: I will update sync up excel
Github Issue #259 Update Research Section review
Jeff: I have some review work on it
Sheri: I can put this on a google doc and ask for everyone's opinion
Sheri: I will send an email to everyone
rssagent, make minutes
Sheri: We can add as a research appendix
Sheri: replace 1.3 or we can put a brief information in 1.3 and detailed one in research section
Sheri: I can opt for anything
Fazio: I do not want to break the flow of reading, so we can add as a anchor list for moreinformation
Sheri: I will do that in a couple of days
Thanks CharlesL
Jeff: Proposed to add new "Oversight and Culture" dimension Proof point language:
Exception / risk acceptance process which includes justification, time limits, and executive approval in place for non-accessible digital assets developed procured, or used by the organization
Fazio: it is wordy but good
Sheri: It covers all aspects and it is not wordy
<Fazio> Jeff proposes adding the following proof point to oversight and culture: Exception / risk acceptance process which includes justification, time limits, and executive approval, in place for non-accessible digital assets developed procured, or used by the organization.
<Neha> +1
CharlesL: IAAP mentions many maturity models CMM, BDF. Shall we mention those?
Sheri: CMM is not related to a11y but overall s/w develop so we can mention that
BDF is proprietary
Sheri: BDF is UK specific
Sheri: DAM is open source, I wrote it
Jeff: No it is not
Sheri: looks like they changed it after our research
Sheri: I will send of google doc link after updates