14:53:13 RRSAgent has joined #maturity 14:53:17 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/06/11-maturity-irc 14:53:17 inviting RRSAgent 14:53:17 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:53:18 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Fazio 14:53:32 meeting: Maturity Model Task Force 14:53:41 chair: David Fazio 14:56:08 Agenda+ New Business 14:56:08 Agenda+ Github Issue #263 Change Culture Dimension To Oversight and Culture 14:57:23 agenda+ Github Issue #259 Update Research Section review 14:57:48 Neha has joined #maturity 14:58:47 present+ 15:00:43 SusiPallero has joined #maturity 15:01:30 jkline has joined #maturity 15:01:46 present+ 15:02:09 CharlesL has joined #maturity 15:02:16 present+ 15:03:14 present+ 15:03:22 present+ 15:03:40 Dr_Keith has joined #maturity 15:04:00 sheri_b-h present+ 15:04:16 scribe+ 15:04:31 zakim, start meeting 15:04:31 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:04:33 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Neha 15:04:39 present+ 15:04:49 zakim, next item 15:04:49 agendum 1 -- New Business -- taken up [from Fazio] 15:04:57 agenda? 15:05:53 q+ 15:07:12 Fazio: wai leadership wants to stay updated with style guide, abstract and introduction updates, so every thing is on the track 15:07:28 jkline has joined #maturity 15:10:14 CharlesL: Gave TPAC visit updates, mostly joining virtually 15:10:50 q? 15:10:55 ack CharlesL 15:11:04 zakim, next item 15:11:04 agendum 2 -- Github Issue #263 Change Culture Dimension To Oversight and Culture -- taken up [from Fazio] 15:11:43 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/263 15:11:44 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/263 -> Issue 263 Change Culture Dimension To Oversight and Culture (by Helixopp) 15:12:35 Fazio: It strarted from #244 There are currently no proof points related to fiscal aspects of implementing the maturity model. Without budget for the initiative, probability of success (full maturity ) is low 15:13:00 Fazio: we decided to change Culture Dimension To Oversight and Culture 15:14:02 Fazio: Proposed new "Oversight and Culture" dimension Proof point language: 15:14:02 Exception / risk acceptance process which includes justification, time limits, and executive approval in place for non-accessible digital assets developed, procured, or used by the organization. 15:14:24 Fazio: Resolved #255 15:14:56 Fazio: De we need separate proof points, Jeff? 15:15:22 Jeff: We need separate proof points 15:15:37 Jeff: They are also mentioned in #244 15:16:26 Fazio: we have sample language with issue #244 and #255 15:17:38 Should: "Financial planning in place and funding committed for advancing this dimension's proof points to full maturity (optimize stage)" go in Oversight or all dimensions 15:17:43 Jeff: Shall we add it in one place or add it as a separate proof points in each dimension 15:18:31 I think it should have a place on each dimension 15:19:02 Fazio: It should be inside Oversight 15:19:36 q? 15:19:41 Jeff: Still thinking about it as it should not be missed by people 15:19:45 ack Dr_Keith 15:21:06 Dr_Keith: still unclear where it will fit as there is a very thin line 15:21:34 q+ 15:21:48 Fazio: Explained with the help of central fund vs department fund example 15:23:32 Jeff: Producment of a thing requires it to be present and it does not bother where it is but just want it to be covered 15:25:27 Fazio: We have only 2 Proof points in culture so we may be able to separate it 15:27:18 ack CharlesL 15:29:17 CharlesL: Originally I was with Dr_Keith that we should have it at one place and refer from there. Duplicating it in some dimensions may increase confusion. 15:30:17 CharlesL: It may it missed if it placed at one place, so I dont know 15:30:49 s/CharlesL/JeffK 15:32:08 Jeff: I guess an experienced person would be dealing with this so it won't confuse I suppose 15:33:14 Fazio: three options 15:33:30 1. Put it in all dimensions 15:33:42 2. Put it in Oversight 15:33:56 Option 2 - Place in Oversight 15:34:08 3. Have a different version in Oversight 15:34:18 I vote Option 2. 15:34:33 Neha: Option 1 15:34:52 Option 1 but I am ok with having 2 for now 15:35:15 option 2 15:35:41 I'm ok 15:35:52 Option 2 = 4 15:35:56 I am also okay 15:37:54 Oversight and Culture Proof Point language Financial planning in place and funding committed for advancing progress in all dimensions towards full maturity 15:38:27 Attempting to have Jeff Kline rejoin IRC 15:38:37 jkline has joined #maturity 15:39:25 jkline present+ 15:39:59 Jeff: I will update sync up excel 15:40:05 zakim, next item 15:40:05 agendum 3 -- Github Issue #259 Update Research Section review -- taken up [from Fazio] 15:40:05 jkline has joined #maturity 15:40:29 queue+ 15:41:38 Jeff: I have some review work on it 15:42:02 Sheri: I can put this on a google doc and ask for everyone's opinion 15:42:14 Sheri: I will send an email to everyone 15:42:27 rssagent, make minutes 15:43:22 Sheri: We can add as a research appendix 15:45:12 Sheri: replace 1.3 or we can put a brief information in 1.3 and detailed one in research section 15:45:21 Sheri: I can opt for anything 15:46:21 rrsagent, make logs public 15:46:26 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:46:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/06/11-maturity-minutes.html CharlesL 15:46:35 Fazio: I do not want to break the flow of reading, so we can add as a anchor list for moreinformation 15:47:15 Sheri: I will do that in a couple of days 15:47:26 Thanks CharlesL 15:49:18 Jeff: Proposed to add new "Oversight and Culture" dimension Proof point language: 15:49:18 Exception / risk acceptance process which includes justification, time limits, and executive approval in place for non-accessible digital assets developed procured, or used by the organization 15:50:22 Fazio: it is wordy but good 15:50:43 Sheri: It covers all aspects and it is not wordy 15:51:04 Jeff proposes adding the following proof point to oversight and culture: Exception / risk acceptance process which includes justification, time limits, and executive approval, in place for non-accessible digital assets developed procured, or used by the organization. 15:51:11 +1 15:52:49 CharlesL: IAAP mentions many maturity models CMM, BDF. Shall we mention those? 15:53:10 Sheri: CMM is not related to a11y but overall s/w develop so we can mention that 15:53:34 BDF is proprietary 15:54:43 Sheri: BDF is UK specific 15:57:21 Sheri: DAM is open source, I wrote it 15:57:42 Jeff: No it is not 15:58:07 Sheri: looks like they changed it after our research 15:59:26 Sheri: I will send of google doc link after updates 16:00:35 zakim, end meeting 16:00:35 As of this point the attendees have been Fazio, jkline, CharlesL, SusiPallero, Neha, Dr_Keith 16:00:37 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:00:38 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/06/11-maturity-minutes.html Zakim 16:00:44 I am happy to have been of service, Neha; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:00:44 Zakim has left #maturity