Meeting minutes
present rahim
present spectranaut_
present mgarrish
present jnurthen
present?
Problem 2 of "Characteristics of Roles section needs tidying up" aria #1263
https://
pkra: since my PR only addresses part of this, I'm wondering what to do about the rest.
… discussed in the group. we want to update the presentational children section.
… pkra will split out a new issue
jnurthen: what about the abstract role part?
… another case of booleans. And the characteristics tables use yet another phrasing
pkra: name required is also true/false in tables
jnurthen: and not even mentioned. I think there was an issue filed to get that.
pkra: I'll split out more issues then.
SVG-AAM accname revisions (and the broader question from Melanie on moving similar sections to accname) svg-aam #31
pkra: really about Melanie's question whether to move accname pieces from AAMs into accname.
… I wanted to bring this up here.
jnurthen: not sure about it. The markup groups could decide they want to specify accnames itself. Feels better to have it separate.
pkra: but then we could just remove it?
jnurthen: but accname is just about aria. It would be overcomplicated.
rahim: I think Melanie asked about just moving the pieces over.
jnurthen: ok. Still, I feel it would be cleaner to start "is this aria? If not, go look at other spec"
spectranaut_: we should give feedback on that PR
continued aria.js work aria #2501: how much can we refactor out of existence? (Cf. aria #1897
pkra: looking at issues blocked by the refactoring work.
… came upon w3c/
… which made me wonder whether we want to tackle that and what that would mean.
mgarrish: I think this is just about exporting definitions.
jnurthen: right. we only export the ones we need across specs.
… not sure how useful some are.
… we should ask Don what's needed.
pkra: ok I'll ask Dom what it would take.
… when I get back to this issue.