Meeting minutes
jason: propsal to reorganise with outlined secitons
some more open issues raised, good to consider intended changes
<Joshue108> Here is the draft branch from me https://
janina: good ot talk through reorganisaiton
shawn: good to hear about proposed changes at high level
josh: restructure proposed before some of github issues b
some new sections
included a section on authoring accessible content
anther seciotn - AI and user perspective
seciton - evaluaiton tools and AI teting
seciotn - AI generaiotn , possibly overlays
seciton - potentila harms in AI
jason: other proposals?
janina: can work with this structure
jason: some github issues woud fit, introducitonadn ethers disucsion
kevin: does tease out higher levle issues
sign posting what documetn is trying ot achieve, tentative positive direciton
<kevin> +1
mathew: value the RQTF work,
good lit review/gap analysis, poitning to other W3C resources and summary,
if this is the goal, good approach
<stacey> in section 4.1 ATAG and UAAG links are switched, FYI
jason: concern raised about evulation methods to conrim system is able ot meet users needs in unpredictable machine lenring, want to check it works with this structure
matthew: yes, can ifle two separate issues
janina: would propose go through github issues as to where it woudl fit in that structure
step 1: merge Josh's restructure
2. Github issues: go through and make note inside the restructure secitons
3. if doens't fit, teases out what's missing
kevin: when woudl first drraft be published?
janina: need tighter coordination, more frequent check-in
<Zakim> shawn, you wanted to say address potential conflicts and publish draft with lots of notes
shawn: fine to publish 1PWD wiht a lot of open quesitons
need to get quesitons filled in
coudl be seciotns with editors notes, 'thinking about this',
just getting sensistivies addressed
kevin: +1, keen to get to a point where we can publish someitng osoner rather htan later
a document with lots of flags is fine for wokrign draft
signal to community we want ot open up converaiotn
and Josh's strucutreis good step forward
need to rip apart scope, doesn't really say where it needs to go and explaining this isimportant part
janina: will work on scope to tell clear story
josh: great. lots of good quesitons to ask and point to what' sthere, raise falgs
jason: thing that resonated with everyone is that its a issues paper. unusual in W3C,
generally note the issues and understood solutions or aren't, and provide conceptual scheme ot think about
and make decisiona bout quesitons int he document
is this a good prupose in achivement?
<Zakim> shawn, you wanted to note "issues papers" and literature review
shawn is literature reivew needed,
andwhat does the world need form tis document
kevin: +1
janian: +1 too
still need to address issue of citations, no easy way in academic process that requires hadn editing
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to discuss lit review citations issue; also process to stay coordinated
also woudl be good to dicuss hwo to stay coordiated
jason: won't have complete bibliography for some tme due to rapdily evolving subject area
kevin: noted. will look at how to manage citations
we can use technology platforms we have to point to relevant research
<Zakim> kevin, you wanted to talk about citations and to talk about rapid field
shawn: +1, acknowledge technical issue
also looking at sharing of resources as you go
here's the summary, here's key poitns etc
jason: bibliogropahy cited as relevance int eh text and authors slective on what's relevant
public review process helps with those decisions, will provide additional references
or highlight other reosurces.
Public ocmments valuable in that process
scott: +1 ot public comment helping clarify resources
jason: being able ot importa references, that tehcnical issue is an issue and appreicaed noted help
raja: quesiton - sibib text acceptable?
jason: bibliogropahal databases can export to man formats
<Joshue108> scribe/sibib/Is bib
<kevin> +1 ... tell us what you want! :)
<Joshue108> SH: Bibtex works for me
janina; let's pick a format
Accessibility of Machine Learning and Generative AI.
jason: immersive captions follow up - any updates
janian; no