W3C

– DRAFT –
WoT and NGSI-LD

20 January 2025

Attendees

Present
Ali_Benfattoumu, Franck_LE_GALL, Frederic_LE, Juanjo_Hierro, Kaz_Ashimura, Ken_Zangelin, Martin_Bauer, Michael_Koster, Michael_McCool
Regrets
-
Chair
McCool
Scribe
Franck, kaz

Meeting minutes

Minutes

<kaz> Jan-13

Revised previous minutes. No objections.

Activities

<kaz> GitHub page - resources.md

<kaz> SynchroniCity Project

Juanjo: Unsure who and why Synchronicity report was brought in.

Kaz: that was mentioned by Charith privately during the liaison call last week.

Juanjo: this report may not be relevant

Franck: quite old project. More recent documents exists

McCool: any newer resource around Smart Cities?

FIWARE4CITIES Book (directory

Link for the PDF of the Book

Franck+Ali: (links for the "FIWARE4CITIES Book" above)

Use Cases

<kaz> examples/README.md

McCool: Next is use case. No PR yet.

McCool: need to work on use cases

Martin: ISG CIM team to look at mapping of NGSI-LD Primer to WoT concepts

McCool: New WoT process to progress use case descriptions / Capturing requirements
… That new requirement collection process must be used to get updates in the spec
… Go to the template which contains instructions (https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/issues/new?template=use-case-template.yml)

McCool: (will also ask Ege Korkan from Siemens on WoT CG's use case ideas.)

Juanjo: our situation not comparable to OPC-UA approach. Idea here is to be able to access Things described through WoT descriptions over the NGSI-LD API

Kaz: just to make sure, we need to clarify whether we would like to the ISG CIM team to use the WoT template or not.

McCool: at the moment, the WoT Use Cases template is for the WoT side

Logistics

McCool: ISG CIM Plenary next week. Franck & Martin not available
… So the next meeting on Feb. 3rd

Deliverables

<kaz> proposals/liaison.md - Liaison Charter

McCool: add to scope : collaborative work on use

McCool: need to prioritize use cases / documents

McCool: The 2 already listed documents correspond to north/south bound interface discussion

McCool: suggest to delete initial scope items as well as listed deliverables to first focus on use cases exploration.

Kaz: we've been holding kind of long discussion about those sections, so removing them would be a bit of a waste. I'd suggest keep those sections with a title of "Possible", "Expected" or "May work on" :)

<McCool> w3c/wot-ngsi-ld#3 (McCool changed the "Deliverables" section's title to "Possible Deliverables"

[adjourned]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 242 (Fri Dec 20 18:32:17 2024 UTC).