Meeting minutes
<Lisa> decision making
<Lisa> See: https://
<lisa> next item
Lisa: Updates and actions reviewed per item 1 - looking for recommendations or changes to the format of the Action items
Lisa: Structure subgroup will present next week, then close with W3C, Lead Rain
Lisa: Mental health and other proposal draft, currently lead Rashmi
Lisa: Placeholder for internationalization, Lead Jan. Currently in progress.
Lisa: Templates for i18n to start January
Lisa: Findability, supported decision making, in January
Lisa: Github issue review on Thursday with Eric and Lisa
Lisa: Next Issue review, big topic reviews for next calls agenda items.
Lisa: We are collecting or centralizing the editorial feedback we've gotten from i18n work, Rain's studies, etc.
Lisa: Currently working on sprint for issues paper; Julie working on conversation voice, Becca on Safety. Then back to Content Usable
Lisa: Additional overviews, replacing editor notes, etc.
Lisa: Other subgroup tasks, mental health. Jan and David working on items.
julierawe: Doc shared on WCAG 3 updates; vote by Dec 5. Three guidelines added, clear meaning, image alternatives and keyboard focus appearance. Guidelines for subgroup work refocused.
julieawe: New subsections, Clear Meaning (our subgroup) will be part of draft
julierawe: Simplified Written Content, this hasn't started and can be renamed
julierawe: Text Appearance, starts this month, includes contrast size, style
julierawe: Text to speech, new subgroup this month
julierawe: Clear Meaning includes non-literal text, abbreviations, ambiguous numbers, text that leaves out letters or diacritics
Julierawe: Simplified Written text can be renamed; includes avoid double negatives, sentence structure, verb tense, uncommon words, appropriate tone (for now)
julierawe: Topic sentence was moved to layout under structure including section labels, purpose and focusing on a single idea at a time. This can also be moved back if COGA wants.
julierawe: Will check to find source of the voting invite (for Dec 5th for this draft) to ease COGA members ability to vote
<julierawe> https://
Jan: Update on Internationalization, 9AM EST for next meeting
<lisa> next item
Lisa: COGA editorial this Thursday will be on as normal.
<lisa> next item
Lisa: Our actions page (docs) is difficult to synch with github (per most other w3c groups), although github is not easy to use. Reviewed our current Actions document format with groups.
<lisa> things we could do better?
Lisa: Main point of discussion, how can we make this easier to help folks move back and forth from docs to github
tiffanyburtin: Following threads can be difficult in AG (github), our Actions document is a lot of information but is currently workable
Lisa: Table of Contents is always difficult to regenerate and follow (as author and reader).
tiffanyburtin: Willing to review and add suggestions to make it easier to consume.
Lisa: TOC may or may not be a useful tool - making consistent look and feel may help.
Lisa: Looking for any suggestions and improvements. Please connect if you have any thoughts.
<lisa> next item
<lisa> https://
Lisa: Supported decision making per linked document. We have had feedback, did some re-ranking - working draft doesn't need to be perfect only to get feedback. Early editors draft for feedback - are we ready to move to that state?
Lisa: Reviewed SDM paper online - indicated that format, spelling not a big deal for now. Reviews some suggestions already added.
Lisa: Is it worth editing and putting in draft of issue papers (editors draft) as a way to gather feedback?
<julierawe> +1 to publishing draft
<Eric_hind> +1
Lisa: Will sent it out to the group for review
<lisa> Any objections?
<Jan> +1
<lisa> next item
julierawe: question on Supported decision making in w3c - there's a shift to effective participation? To be reviewed to understand more of the context.
<Jan> Hi everyone - my apologies, but I have to drop for another call.
Lisa: Issues and suggestions - high level review. Should user needs supercede solutions?