Meeting minutes
Agenda Review
Action Items
<addison> #137
<gb> Action 137 Create new meeting series in the W3C calendar (on xfq)
<addison> close #137
<gb> Closed issue #137
<addison> #135
addison: added action to xfq, and edited calendar event, so done #137
<gb> Action 135 follow up on XR issue 1393 about locale in session (on aphillips) due 2024-10-17
addison: will have chat next week for #135
<addison> #134
<gb> Action 134 file an issue about making input respect locale (on aphillips) due 2024-10-05
<addison> #131
<gb> Action 131 follow up on input-events action (on aphillips)
addison: #131 done
<addison> close #131
<gb> Closed issue #131
<addison> #128
<gb> Action 128 perform review of issues for inclusion in specdev (on xfq) due 2024-09-30
xfq: #128 not yet
<addison> #127
<gb> Action 127 make a list of shared topics of interest between TG2 and W3C-I18N (on aphillips) due 2024-09-30
<addison> #125
<gb> Action 125 propose creating a UTR for text-emphasis skip if we can get help with maintain (on aphillips) due 2024-09-30
addison: #125 done, but wait for next CSS+i18n call for confirmation
<addison> #114
<gb> Action 114 read through i18n-activity#1659 and report on whether we're satisfied (on r12a) due 2024-08-22
<addison> #90
<gb> Action 90 steal some of henri's text from scroll-to-text-fragment for string-search (on aphillips) due 2024-04-18
<addison> #89
<gb> Action 89 update i18n specs to support dark mode (on xfq) due 2024-04-18
<addison> #33
<gb> Action 33 Close issues marked `close?` or bring to WG for further review (on aphillips)
<addison> #8
<gb> Action 8 Follow up on the status of Canvas and formatted text (on aphillips) due 18 Jul 2023
<addison> #7
<gb> Action 7 Remind shepherds to tend to their awaiting comment resolutions (Evergreen) (on aphillips, xfq, himorin, r12a, bert-github) due 18 Jul 2023
<addison> #4
<gb> Action 4 Work with respec and bikeshed to provide the character markup template as easy-to-use markup (on aphillips, r12a) due 27 Jul 2023
addison: done some clean ups on repo, not see any other
Info Share
addison: did have unicode technical workshp, xfq was there
… presentation about string-meta, received good feedbacks
… linking with our groups
… also some conversation on message format there
xfq: good event, met with lots of people
… lightweight event, exchanged email with some for like joining to WG
… will discuss with them
addison: good for recruting for our activities, also I've chatted with several colleagues
xfq: chatted with credential colleagues on slack for review, and requesting review on FPWD
… guided them for review
… they may try to use FPWD one
addison: did some review, also they marked self review with tracker
… add some template to follow these?
ACTION: xfq: add text to the issue templates to clarify what to use when
<gb> Created action #138
xfq: would do
RADAR Review
<addison> https://
xfq: can take EPUB 3.3
bert: will take media capabilities
atsushi: take picture in picture
addison: will take Vision document
… also already working on FedCM
addison: any waiting comment resolution?
Pending Issue Review
<addison> https://
addison: some for FedCM spec
<addison> #1927
<gb> Issue 1927 not found
<addison> i18n-activity#1927
<gb> Issue 1927 Add a further explanation of `ltr` and `rtl` (based on ePub). (by w3cbot) [pending] [tracker] [s:rdf-concepts]
addison: this is PR from rdf colleagues, if no other comment, will mark as tracker and close
<addison> i18n-activity#1924
<gb> Issue 1924 ContactAddress 'region' inconsistencies (by w3cbot) [pending] [tracker] [s:contact-picker] [wg:das] [wg:webapps]
addison: some from contact picker
Issue 599
<addison> i18n-activity#599
<gb> Issue 599 highly detailed text in video content (by stpeter) [pending] [tracker] [s:mst-content-hint] [wg:webrtc] [Agenda+]
<addison> w3c/
<gb> Issue 35 highly detailed text in video content (by aphillips) [Ready for PR] [i18n-tracker]
addison: propose to do as needs-resolution
xfq: +1
atsushi: +1
<r12a> +1
addison: will change label
Working with Time and Timezones as DNOTE?
<addison> https://
<addison> The old doc: https://
<addison> The new version: https://
addison: timezone spec, find new version have large change
xfq: republish with note status?
r12a: draft or not
addison: do we want to publish v2 now, or draft?
r12a: state for no, long time elapsed
addison: republish with warning box in-line?
<Bert> (The Process doc says very little about (Draft) Notes, but it says ‘Both Notes and Draft Notes can be updated by republishing as a Note or Draft Note.’ without ‘respectively’, so I think they can be republised with either status.)
r12a: add action to go through and see any issue
… for addison
ACTION: addison: review old timezone note to ensure all content is present and accounted for
<gb> Created action #139
r12a: we should check before any publication
addison: will check for next week, and evaluate any missing point or correction
Specdev PRs
<addison> w3c/
<gb> Pull Request 145 Allow Ruby use in non-CJKM languages (by jyasskin) [Agenda+] [Best Practice] [normative]
addison: take a look at PRs
addison: #145, proposal to make text less CJKM restrictive on ruby use case
<gb> Issue 145 not found
addison: discussed before,,,
r12a: use in these language are prioritized, but what mean by this change?
xfq: prioritized part is not clear
<addison> Ruby markup in HTML is designed primarily for Chinese, <a data-cite="jlreq#usage_of_ruby">Japanese</a>, Korean, and Mongolian requirements. Note that ruby is also sometimes used to associate annotations with text in other languages. However, specifications should avoid proposing new uses for it.
addison: proposal above
r12a: like last sentence
addison: like pulling out from mustard? or something else?
… for middle part
[ruby for phonetic or not, another mechanism or?]
<r12a> https://
xfq: what jeffery means was ruby display style is different from markup
<addison> Ruby markup in HTML is designed primarily for Chinese, <a data-cite="jlreq#usage_of_ruby">Japanese</a>, Korean, and Mongolian requirements. While sometimes used in other languages, such annotation generally should use other mechanisms. Specifications should avoid proposing new uses for Ruby.
r12a: was no answer for what happens when it is use with non-CJK
addison: how about proposal above again?
<addison> Annotation in other languages should use other mechanisms.
addison: propose change to this PR?
[all agreed]
ACTION: addison: reply to specdev 145 including proposal discussed in telecon
<gb> Created action #140
r12a: use word 'semantics'
<addison> w3c/
<gb> Pull Request 146 Fix examples (by aphillips)
<addison> https://
addison: resolves comment from i18n activity in hebrew
<addison> https://
<addison> https://
[on examples in non-English]
<addison> https://
addison: add "you will be expected to show" but "...." or something
<addison> w3c/
<gb> Pull Request 142 Add a note about EGCs (by aphillips)
addison: extending graphime cluster one
<xfq> https://
addison: it's introducing front
r12a: example 4 caption should alter language
addison: here, trying to address comments without touching what UTC doesn't touch
… will go back through original text for corner cases
<r12a> https://
[about examples]