Meeting minutes
/join #rqtf
<matatk> s/\/join #rqtf//
Agenda Review & Announcements
New Charters Review
Publishing Maintenance Working Group Recharter
<Roy_Ruoxi> - charter: https://
<Roy_Ruoxi> - issue: w3c/
Roy_Ruoxi: No new charter this week, but follow up to last week.
<matatk> Minutes from last week on this: https://
matatk: I forgot to ask this question: Someone from the group told me they were expecting more future changes but we were still asked for the review. Due to the confusion, I wanted to ask the group again
Roy_Ruoxi: I think we already can review it now
janina: I volunteer to look at this charter, need a few days for this.
matatk: Due day is next week, so we need to keep this in our mind
HR A11y Review Comment Tracker
Allow any element to be the child of a custom element (parser weirdness permitting)
<Roy_Ruoxi> - issue: whatwg/
matatk: Seeing this for the first time, but I see Lea and Dominic in this thread with good points. I can't immediatly think of a show stopping issue here, still cautious if we lose information this way?
PaulG: I think it's the right idea and want to see this go on, but there will be of course future work for ARIA and browser vendors for the mapping
matatk: I think we have the beginning of a comment here. I will add our points to the GitHub issue thread
Gottfried: We need to keep ordered list, unordered list and description list in mind here
JenStrickland: Guidance on custom elements vs native elements is in my opinion important here. When to use what
Would also like to hear Steve F on this topic ...
<matatk> https://
matatk: Very good points here. To answer JenStrickland: I think there might be something in the web plattform design principles. I will look into this
matatk: I will assign myself to the tracking issue
Explicit Review Requests
Vision for W3C
<Roy_Ruoxi> - issue: w3c/
<Roy_Ruoxi> - Note: https://
Roy_Ruoxi: Important document, would like feedback on this one
matatk: Would any of us like to review it?
Fredrik: I will do it.
<JenStrickland> I'm already giving it a review for PWE, as well. Good coverage!
WebXR Gamepads Module Level 1
<Roy_Ruoxi> - issue: w3c/
<Roy_Ruoxi> - tracking: https://
<Roy_Ruoxi> - ping: immersive-web/
<Roy_Ruoxi> - self-review: immersive-web/
Roy_Ruoxi: We reviewed it in 2022. They gave us new feedback recently
matatk: I'm happy to do this one, because I did the first review
The user must be able to disable use of the Vibration API
<matatk> Proposed issue: w3c/
matatk: Another topic: When we do spec reviews, we take a good look at the documents, but this process takes sometimes a lot of time. There are situation where this is a sort bottleneck. I would like to address this. See my proposed idea: w3c/
matatk: A template for creating issues already exists, we can use this. I will also create a wiki entry with guidance
<Fazio> +1 to Matthews comment
<PaulG> +1
<mike_beganyi> +1 also
<Gottfried> +1
<Roy_Ruoxi> +1
<JenStrickland> I'm struggling with absorbing all the content, so trusting y'all. I did hear a few things that sounded on-target. :)
<JenStrickland> +1
(matatk showing his VIbration API comment, asks if it is okay)
<niklasegger> +1
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to suggest inserting RFC2119
<matatk> Do you approve of the proposed APA comment on Vibration API?
<matatk> +1
<JenStrickland> +1
<niklasegger> +1
<janina> +1
<mike_beganyi> +1
<Roy_Ruoxi> +1
(matatk going over the issue template/process and explaining the steps)
<matatk> Here are i18n's instructions (which we will adopt and adapt for APA WG repos etc.): https://
mike_beganyi: Where do we give "official" feedback on comments like yours here (Vibration API)
matatk: Either here on the call or through Cfc. You can also comment on the list or through a comment/ thumps up on the tracking issue
New on TR
nothing new
CSS Update (Paul)
<PaulG> https://
PaulG: There are four issues, which haven't been discussed yet.
matatk: Any news on the TPAC issues?
PaulG: Nothing new
Actions check-in
mike_beganyi: I think I was assigned to an issue, but unfortunately I didn't get a proper notification
<matatk> w3c/
<JenStrickland> Reviewing w3c/