W3C

– DRAFT –
WCAG 3 Implied Meaning Subgroup

29 oct 2024

Attendees

Present
Frankie, JohnRochford, julierawe, kirkwood, Laura_Carlson, LenB, Makoto, mike_beganyi
Regrets
Jan, Rain
Chair
julierawe
Scribe
julierawe

Meeting minutes

Ha, good morning, JohnRochford!

Overview of next steps for this subgroup

Getting whatever we have ready to publish by next week

Will decide how soon we want to start another sprint to finish the draft

<Laura_Carlson> Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/AGWGSubgroupParticipation_Oct_24/results

<LenB> presemt+

<JohnRochford> Oh, Laura, thanks a lot (or not!)

The next subgroups:

Views subgroup

Voice control subgroup

Text contrast subgroup

Text-to-speech subgroup

Definitions

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P7fOyEPVlqf1aXuJY0SO9LeC-E7EZllg/edit#heading=h.d43df5fxyg8f

Reviewed user-centered outcome, goal and what to do

JohnRochford "Can have more than one meaning" might not be clear enough

JohnRochford A phrase with more than one implied meaning is often referred to as a polyseme.

Over the next week, let's think about how to refine that sentence and add an example

mike_beganyi Emoji definition is good, general enough

mike_beganyi Maybe swap out sushi for an emoji that is easier to see if you have low vision

Laura_Carlson Maybe swap in a cup of tea

Literal text: Literal text uses words’ primary dictionary definition to convey exactly what is written. Unlike figurative or non-literal language, literal text does not have implied meaning. Literal text uses the direct or denotative meaning of the words.

Frankie No one knows what "denotative" means

Let's remove the jargony "denotative"

JohnRochford Why are we mentioning "figurative"?

kirkwood I think we should keep it. Government guidance use the term and say to avoid "figurative language"

kirkwood We may need to use the term more prominently

<kirkwood> are missing the term “figurative language”: "Don't use figurative language" means to avoid using any language that is not meant to be taken literally, such as metaphors, similes, hyperbole, or other expressions that convey a meaning beyond the direct words used; instead, stick to plain, straightforward descriptions and statements

mike_beganyi "Primary dictionary definition" or "meaning"?

Literal text uses the direct meaning of words to convey exactly what is written. Unlike non-literal or figurative language, literal text does not have implied meaning.

Group agrees with rewording

Non-literal text uses words or phrases in a way that goes beyond their standard or dictionary meaning to express deeper, more complex ideas. This is also called figurative language. To understand it, users have to interpret the implied or connotative meaning behind the words, rather than just their literal or direct meaning.

remove "connottive"

mike_beganyi Good that it's longer

Clarification: Non-literal text does *not* include industry terms or jargon that use the literal meaning of these words or phrases. (The use of specialized terms for a general audience will be covered in a different WCAG 3 outcome.)

kirkwood It's confusing

mike_beganyi The word "cookie" as an example

Methods section

OK to reword to "Does the available user agent, including assistive technology, sufficiently [DELETE: Explain] [ADD: Provide an alternative to] non-literal text?

User-centered outcome: Users can access the literal meaning of text. If the text has implied meaning, users can get explanations or access an alternate version. Examples of non-literal text include sarcasm, metaphors, similes, idioms, and emoji characters.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P7fOyEPVlqf1aXuJY0SO9LeC-E7EZllg/edit#bookmark=id.ku10m814n63m

Method #3: Provide an alternative to non-literal text.

Provide an alternative to non-literal text, such as a version that uses only literal text or that explains the implied meaning. se one of the techniques below to make users users must be aware of the presence of non-literal content and that an explanation is available

<kirkwood> provide an understandable alternative

<kirkwood> or a meaningful alternative?

Next steps

Anyone who is free at 12pm ET today: Please join the Implied Meaning breakout room at the AG meeting so we can keep talking about the methods section

Asynchronous homework for everyone: Please review the Methods section over the next week so we can align at next Tuesday's meeting at 9am ET, thanks.

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 238 (Fri Oct 18 20:51:13 2024 UTC).

Diagnostics

No scribenick or scribe found. Guessed: julierawe

Maybe present: Clarification

All speakers: Clarification

Active on IRC: Frankie, JohnRochford, julierawe, kirkwood, Laura_Carlson, LenB, Makoto, mike_beganyi