W3C

– DRAFT –
RQTF meeting

16 October 2024

Attendees

Present
janina, jasonjgw, scott_h
Regrets
-
Chair
-
Scribe
jasonjgw, scott_h

Meeting minutes

agena+ Collaboration Tools Accessibility User Requirements.

Miscellaneous topics.

janina: Josh to return to support AI work,

Collaboration Tools Accessibility User Requirements.

<janina> w3c/ctaur#73

<gb> Issue 73 Keep it simple with as few steps as possible - user need 20 (by lseeman)

janina: can accept, bsic principle

jason: need to be careful about the word 'clear'

some edtiorw rok but can include

janin: happy to do daft

janina happy to do draft for all changes, Jason offer ot review

janina: belongs together with previous

scott: do we want to link back to WCAG SC

jason: accept in princple but somew ork needed

jason: ihow aobut indicate prominently on the UI that these things are active , satus line

janina: auto timeout without activity to avoid monopolising editing

agreed that we wno't remove these items, but will add note on teh requirements above

<RajaKushalnagar> Status bars are an expected component in all UIs

janina: user-invokved perhaps

raja: standard has lmitedinformaiton on this

janina: a status that someone has been invoked the lock temporarily woudl resolve,

agrred clarifying note to be added

jason: concern that WSIWYG removes tools that don't use it

scott: shoudl be tool-agnostic,

janina: yes APIs suport interfaces

agreed will not fix

janina: don't know how the machine cna know why

user can add it, but machine can't

so can't require of vendors

jason: unlikely somsone woudl constantly explain their reasoning for changes

janain: metadata for status of author and time, but not the wy

agreed to partially accept

agreed that we need some clarify on the action for this

janina: if there's multiple user-selectable ways on proposed edits line by line woudl e good

superior guidance

jason: colour alone WCAG issue

janina: multipel ways should address it

user configuraiotn options

agreed to action

jason: coud accept this

user need 12

agreed: yes accept

janina: good principle ot have AI generated noted as such

soctt: good to delcare, like sponsored links are declared

test

janina: metadata can log who made teh change

jason: check if related to earleir issue

may be a duplicate

janina: support the general principle

scott: I think it's covered already

agreed to defer to assess if its already present

janina: antoher isue for deferring

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 237 (Fri Oct 4 02:31:45 2024 UTC).

Diagnostics

Maybe present: agreed, janain, janin, jason, raja, scott, soctt

All speakers: agreed, janain, janin, janina, jason, raja, scott, soctt

Active on IRC: janina, jasonjgw, RajaKushalnagar, scott_h