Meeting minutes
TOPICS: Pull Requests
Pull Requests
#1951
Pascoe: We've decided that we UV and UP must be zero'd
General agreement around this, some housekeeping and polish to be done but general consensus that this should be merged
will be discussed at the face to face, Apple plans to attend
#2252
Tim: We've said since the beginning we would have two approaches to this topic. If we can make this work with Rolf's proposal, great, but otherwise this work can be done in tandem
Shane: As an RP, I would advocate for Rolf's proposal, because for RP's that have some expectations about the freshness of UV, I would prefer to have requests for authentication pre-evaluated, rather than have to discard a response
Long discussion around preference and trade-offs on Rolf's proposal regarding when the check should be performed
Tim: this is just adding in EA
Nina: lgtm
Pascoe: lgtm
Emil: awaiting review
Tony: this is just an editorial change?
Emil: yeah this is blocked by 1951, will merge after
agl is gone but this is good to go
no problems with merging
Tim: Emil left some good feedback, still on track to merge
Tony: any objections for doing this in L3?
none
Tim: for the record, one client already has this implemented
This is awaiting JohnBradley's review
good to merge
good to merge, no objections
w3c/
Shane: this is not ready to merge because we're still in discussions
Plan is to punt this to the f2f for discussion
Next meeting will be the face to face