19:03:00 RRSAgent has joined #webauthn 19:03:05 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/04/03-webauthn-irc 19:03:12 dwaite has joined #webauthn 19:03:20 Meeting: Web Authentication 19:03:24 Chair: Tony 19:03:27 present+ 19:03:31 present+ 19:10:07 steele has joined #webauthn 19:10:17 nina has joined #webauthn 19:10:30 Zakim has joined #webauthn 19:10:53 Zakim, this conference is WebAuthn Weekly Meeting 19:10:53 got it, steele 19:11:21 Meeting: WebAuthn Weekly Call 19:11:25 Chair: TonyNadalin 19:11:29 Scribe: steele 19:12:54 present+ agl,emil,tim,nick,nina,davidWaite,garret,james,johnSchanck,ricky,simone,johnPascoe,jasonLee,davidTurner 19:13:23 TOPICS: Pull Requests 19:13:26 TOPIC: Pull Requests 19:13:31 #1951 19:13:49 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1951 19:14:24 Pascoe: We've decided that we UV and UP must be zero'd 19:14:35 present+ shane 19:17:14 General agreement around this, some housekeeping and polish to be done but general consensus that this should be merged 19:17:40 will be discussed at the face to face, Apple plans to attend 19:18:17 #2252 19:18:34 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2052 19:19:15 Tim: We've said since the beginning we would have two approaches to this topic. If we can make this work with Rolf's proposal, great, but otherwise this work can be done in tandem 19:21:43 Shane: As an RP, I would advocate for Rolf's proposal, because for RP's that have some expectations about the freshness of UV, I would prefer to have requests for authentication pre-evaluated, rather than have to discard a response 19:31:32 present+ JohnBradley 19:33:12 Long discussion around preference and trade-offs on Rolf's proposal regarding when the check should be performed 19:38:10 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2051 19:38:38 Tim: this is just adding in EA 19:38:48 Nina: lgtm 19:38:58 Pascoe: lgtm 19:44:55 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2046 19:45:01 Emil: awaiting review 19:45:13 Tony: this is just an editorial change? 19:45:27 Emil: yeah this is blocked by 1951, will merge after 19:45:37 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2041 19:45:45 agl is gone but this is good to go 19:46:01 no problems with merging 19:47:51 dwaite has joined #webauthn 19:49:06 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2040 19:49:17 Tim: Emil left some good feedback, still on track to merge 19:49:39 Tony: any objections for doing this in L3? 19:49:41 none 19:49:55 Tim: for the record, one client already has this implemented 19:49:56 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2039 19:50:08 This is awaiting JohnBradley's review 19:51:44 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2032 19:51:56 good to merge 19:51:58 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2031 19:52:15 good to merge, no objections 19:52:34 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2020 19:52:55 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2020 (This is the PR we were discussing earlier) 19:53:07 Shane: this is not ready to merge because we're still in discussions 20:02:45 Plan is to punt this to the f2f for discussion 20:02:52 Next meeting will be the face to face 20:03:10 Zakim, list participants 20:03:10 As of this point the attendees have been agl, emil, tim, nick, nina, davidWaite, garret, james, johnSchanck, ricky, simone, johnPascoe, jasonLee, davidTurner, shane, JohnBradley 20:03:14 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:03:19 RRSAgent, generate minutes 20:03:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/03-webauthn-minutes.html steele 20:03:29 Zakim, bye 20:03:29 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been agl, emil, tim, nick, nina, davidWaite, garret, james, johnSchanck, ricky, simone, johnPascoe, jasonLee, davidTurner, shane, 20:03:29 Zakim has left #webauthn 20:03:32 ... JohnBradley 22:11:09 steele has joined #webauthn