W3C

– DRAFT –
Maturity Model

27 March 2024

Attendees

Present
CharlesL, Fazio, janina, kline, nehaj
Regrets
-
Chair
Fazio
Scribe
nehaj

Meeting minutes

<gb> /issues/101 -> #101

<gb> /issues/107 -> #107

New Business

Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update

CharlesL no updates from subgroup, will be reviewed

<Fazio5> check

Fazio5 no updates

Github Issues 43, 78, 85, 102, 103, 104 (Usability doc feedback)

no updates on usability document

<gb> /issues/101 -> #101

Github Issue #101 What do we mean with 'aspects'? Used in two ways i.c.w. 'dimensions'

<Fazio5> w3c/maturity-model#101

<gb> Issue 101 What do we mean with 'aspects'? Used in two ways i.c.w. 'dimensions' (by jake-abma)

<Fazio5> https://w3c.github.io/maturity-model/#WCAG-maturity-model-audience

janina usage of 'aspects' in the document

discussion on where to provide definition for terminologies used for first time

CharlesL refernce to proof points

Mark_Miller add words in headers of SEO, is there any place where aspect is not pointing to proof point?

Fazio5 dimentions should be used with correct positions of aspects

need to replace aspects with correct words and raise issue for the same

this issue is assigned to Fazio5

Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then

<gb> /issues/107 -> #107

<Fazio5> w3c/maturity-model#107

<gb> Issue 107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then (by jake-abma)

Jeff to send link to the sheet for single digit scoring

Mark_Miller has different thought on usage of optimized and usage of ICT

Fazio5 we are talking about full organization and not part of it

Fazio5 full maturity and optimized should be used together or not

Mark_Miller it should be 'optimizing'

Fazio5 need to be worked on

kline this does not look like a problem

Fazio5 this needs to be table for next meeting

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 221 (Fri Jul 21 14:01:30 2023 UTC).

Diagnostics

No scribenick or scribe found. Guessed: nehaj

Active on IRC: CharlesL, Fazio5, Fazio9, janina, kline, nehaj