IRC log of maturity on 2024-03-27
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:55:31 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #maturity
- 14:55:35 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/03/27-maturity-irc
- 14:55:35 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 14:55:36 [Zakim]
- please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Fazio9
- 14:55:47 [Fazio9]
- meeting: Maturity Model
- 14:56:39 [Fazio9]
- chair: Fazio
- 14:57:30 [Fazio9]
- Agenda+ New Business
- 14:57:30 [Fazio9]
- Agenda+ Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update
- 14:57:30 [Fazio9]
- Agenda+ Github Issues 43, 78, 85, 102, 103, 104 (Usability doc feedback)
- 14:57:30 [Fazio9]
- Agenda+ Github Issue #101 What do we mean with 'aspects'? Used in two ways i.c.w. 'dimensions'
- 14:57:30 [gb]
- /issues/101 -> #101
- 14:57:32 [Fazio9]
- Agenda+ Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then
- 14:57:32 [gb]
- /issues/107 -> #107
- 15:00:41 [janina]
- janina has joined #maturity
- 15:01:27 [janina]
- present+
- 15:01:35 [nehaj]
- nehaj has joined #maturity
- 15:03:54 [nehaj]
- present+
- 15:03:56 [Fazio9]
- present+
- 15:05:22 [Mark_Miller]
- Mark_Miller has joined #Maturity
- 15:07:28 [nehaj]
- scribe+
- 15:07:48 [CharlesL]
- CharlesL has joined #maturity
- 15:08:02 [CharlesL]
- present+
- 15:08:09 [nehaj]
- zakim, next item
- 15:08:09 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- New Business -- taken up [from Fazio9]
- 15:08:11 [janina]
- present+
- 15:10:19 [nehaj]
- zakim, close this item
- 15:10:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 closed
- 15:10:20 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 15:10:20 [Zakim]
- 2. Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update [from Fazio9]
- 15:10:21 [nehaj]
- zakim, next item
- 15:10:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update -- taken up [from Fazio9]
- 15:10:59 [nehaj]
- CharlesL no updates from subgroup, will be reviewed
- 15:12:52 [nehaj]
- zakim, who's here?
- 15:12:52 [Zakim]
- Present: janina, nehaj, Fazio, CharlesL
- 15:12:54 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see CharlesL, Mark_Miller, nehaj, janina, RRSAgent, Zakim, alastairc, gb, kevin
- 15:14:43 [Fazio5]
- Fazio5 has joined #maturity
- 15:14:49 [Fazio5]
- check
- 15:18:27 [nehaj]
- Fazio5 no updates
- 15:18:30 [nehaj]
- zakim, next item
- 15:18:30 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- Github Issues 43, 78, 85, 102, 103, 104 (Usability doc feedback) -- taken up [from Fazio9]
- 15:19:25 [nehaj]
- no updates on usability document
- 15:19:29 [nehaj]
- zakim, next item
- 15:19:29 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 was just opened, nehaj
- 15:19:40 [nehaj]
- zakim, close this item
- 15:19:40 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 closed
- 15:19:41 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 15:19:41 [Zakim]
- 4. Github Issue #101 What do we mean with 'aspects'? Used in two ways i.c.w. 'dimensions' [from Fazio9]
- 15:19:41 [gb]
- /issues/101 -> #101
- 15:19:43 [nehaj]
- zakim, next item
- 15:19:43 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- Github Issue #101 What do we mean with 'aspects'? Used in two ways i.c.w. 'dimensions' -- taken up [from Fazio9]
- 15:23:02 [Fazio5]
- https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/101
- 15:23:02 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/101 -> Issue 101 What do we mean with 'aspects'? Used in two ways i.c.w. 'dimensions' (by jake-abma)
- 15:24:12 [Fazio5]
- https://w3c.github.io/maturity-model/#WCAG-maturity-model-audience
- 15:27:39 [nehaj]
- janina usage of 'aspects' in the document
- 15:32:12 [nehaj]
- discussion on where to provide definition for terminologies used for first time
- 15:32:23 [nehaj]
- CharlesL refernce to proof points
- 15:35:25 [nehaj]
- Mark_Miller add words in headers of SEO, is there any place where aspect is not pointing to proof point?
- 15:36:39 [nehaj]
- Fazio5 dimentions should be used with correct positions of aspects
- 15:38:54 [nehaj]
- need to replace aspects with correct words and raise issue for the same
- 15:39:48 [nehaj]
- this issue is assigned to Fazio5
- 15:40:40 [nehaj]
- zakim, next item
- 15:40:40 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 -- Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then -- taken up [from Fazio9]
- 15:40:40 [gb]
- /issues/107 -> #107
- 15:41:10 [Fazio5]
- https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/107
- 15:41:10 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/107 -> Issue 107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then (by jake-abma)
- 15:48:31 [nehaj]
- Jeff to send link to the sheet for single digit scoring
- 15:50:52 [nehaj]
- Mark_Miller has different thought on usage of optimized and usage of ICT
- 15:51:25 [nehaj]
- Fazio5 we are talking about full organization and not part of it
- 15:52:17 [kline]
- kline has joined #maturity
- 15:52:28 [kline]
- present+
- 15:52:32 [nehaj]
- Fazio5 full maturity and optimized should be used together or not
- 15:53:36 [nehaj]
- Mark_Miller it should be 'optimizing'
- 15:55:21 [nehaj]
- Fazio5 need to be worked on
- 15:55:38 [nehaj]
- kline this does not look like a problem
- 15:56:44 [nehaj]
- Fazio5 this needs to be table for next meeting
- 15:59:11 [nehaj]
- zakim, end meeting
- 15:59:11 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been janina, nehaj, Fazio, CharlesL, kline
- 15:59:14 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 15:59:15 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/27-maturity-minutes.html Zakim
- 15:59:22 [Zakim]
- I am happy to have been of service, nehaj; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye
- 15:59:22 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #maturity