Meeting minutes
<lisa> AG update including o Recharter of AG AND.. Permissions to github via their profile
<lisa> close item 1
<lisa> next item
<lisa> ag members: https://
od: https://
[11: 05am] kirkwood: LS: rejoining AG. might be a bit slow, having given us time.
[11: 06am] kirkwood: LS: link to AG partipants can check if you are a member or inited expert.
<lisa> so you can see if you are an invited extert there
<lisa> organisations that are members: https://
kirkwood: LS: rejoining AG. might be a bit slow, having given us time.
[11: 06am] kirkwood: LS: link to AG partipants can check if you are a member or inited expert.
<lisa> Reach out to the Advisory Committee (AC) representative for your organization. Your organization's AC representative needs to approve and submit you as a representative to the new group. Note: This can occasionally take time (particularly when an organization has a new AC representative), so we suggest starting the conversation with your AC representative sooner rather than later.
LS: this is if you are a member, you write to the person from you company that represents you
LS: invited experts me, john, abby, albert? not sure
<lisa> invited exerts https://
LS: first go to this link;
<lisa> https://
Abbey: i’m good don’t need to do it
Rachael: went through who we are comfortable approvin
Rachael: wait need database to catch up
Rachael: need to have github updated
LS: we have been asked to update github to make sure its there. go to your account on W3C and add github
Racheal: go to edit profiles, connected accounts
LS: go to ‘my account’ , edit profiles, connected accounts : add your github account
LS: i well add to orintation
<lisa> next item
<lisa> close item 3
<lisa> next item
LS: eric couldn’t come
LS: Abby you looked at user research
… we did a survey
… we can update the whole thing?
… we can update parts? with link to wikipage showing things not updated
… this is highly used, in meetings all over the place
… out of date since 2015
Abbey: it’s not very current, even type of users, lot in aging and dimentia since 2015, ADHD in adults
Abbey: 3.6 is def ADHD, autism there is new language
… dysgraphia is not in inere
… is not in there
… there is stuff with user groups needs to be updated
… apheesia, and down syndorme nothing since 2015
… might want to look into Long Covid
… worth a deeper dive impact user groups
LS: your feeling is we should add some
LS: think we can lose some
Abbey: not sure
LS: can put on wki page to be available, without going through review
… same with reserach and cognitive function on a wiki page
Abbey: i think so too
Abbey: companies worked for user groups are most important
LS: proposal to add a module of mental health
LS: we had suggestion for general cognitive function
LS: what we’ve found so far can only do it with volunteers to do work
LS: we need to updte introduction and summary but thats just editorial
LS: but if we need to add sections we need volunteers
LS: don’t need to do all at once, collect research and write
<lisa> upadete the user section, adding mental health, long covid and health , genral LD and coga .. but we have people to look the reaserch
LS: proposal is to update user sections adding mental health, long covid and health (name tbd), inections, brain fog, chemo, general learning disabilities, cognitive disabilities
… with cavaat we have people to look into research
LS: what kind of research is acceptable?
LS: proposal add update user sections adding mental health long covid and brain fog, chemo etc.
<lisa> +1
<abbey> +1
<Albert> +1
+1
<niamh> +1
<lisa> any objections?
Lisa: do we have volunteer to take new user groups?
… anyone volunteering to do update?
LS: maybe three months to read over my guess is 10 documents
Abbey: happy start on ADHD stuff
<lisa> abby: update on adhd
Niamh: rather not commit think about it
LS: Davic mental health one
davic/David
LS: if exists already do we thing 10 papers is enough, 5 papers?
LS: literary review process is the link
<lisa> for an update on out date reasrch is 10 papers enough?
LS: going to propose 10 papers?
LS: are we comforable with that?
<lisa> how to do a lit review ? https://
<lisa> next item
Abbey: think 10 is good, aiming for 10, epecially if its going to be updated
LS: aim is 10 if haven’t done 10 come back to group
<lisa> aim for ten. of cource fgo over if you feel it is useful, come back to the group if less then 10
+1
<lisa> +1
<Albert> +1
<abbey> +1
<lisa> any objections ?
LS: objecions?
seems none
<lisa> next item
LS: Abbey thank you
<lisa> next item
LS: David did you look at CTAUR?
DS: Yeah
LS: going through CTAUR
<lisa> https://
Collabortion Tools Accessibility User Requirments
LS: devid taking over liaison to check loads of comments got into github
DS: going to do for meeting Wednesday
LS: trying to make it easy to find.
DS: yeah inline comments and put in
LS: bienig the sort of interpretor
LS: really good for communication, don’t think we are tagged on any of these issues or that you are tagged at least
LS: vert hard to track, conversation in github we don’t know about it
LS: are the comments in there, want to make sure?
DS: ok
<lisa> next item
LS: we need to learn to get it right from each other
DS: will go to rqtf and APA and will report back
LS sounds good
LS: we can carry on going through proposals for mental health
LS: current poposal for COGA link
LS: we talked about COGA not sure how to handle, too many colors for example in a pattern to look at it more. what would be a good pattern about it
DS: need guidance for use of color rather than specific colors
DS: for example suggesting red for example is difficult
JK: i’m unsure about color in mental health bucket
LS: research stage working memory , doesn’t matter, only use hwo help making real, this will help people with these functional imparisment, then we give an example
… how it helps we first talk about impairments
… David do you want to help
JK; put together a google doc share between david
DS: next proposal is tricky, recognition this and proposal 6 presentaion of seach results, limit links displayed, customize presentation of links including foun size, specific use case for these
… think suggestion was to add as an example. is that going too far?
LS: i go back to the research document. 11-50 partiipants
[link to research document above]
LS: going through reseach document saying that less links was better in proposal said could be new pattern or support simplification. allow less items on page.
… but we also have provide search
DS: it seems niche because we already have something related to seach
DS: except maybe shopping limit to 30 results etc
LS: think it was proble not knowing how to do search terms.
<lisa> add to 4.3.6 Provide Search (Pattern) including boolian instuctions, , reducing itmes, or catagrins, foging terms
<lisa> +1
+1
<DavidSwallow> +1
LS: with 5, 6 and 7 we’d like to add to 4.6.3 provide serahc instruction reduce number of items, f
<lisa> albert +1, but needs more discusion
Abbey: navigatin ecommertcce. ocd is about completion, have to scroll for all options before purchase. i open 50 tabs for one term search
Albert: what help is to have a filter based on price, reviews, that actually works
Albert: those kind of things help me
Albert: can give guidance for accessibile serach pattern
LS: also to find
JK: to reduce number of results
Alberty: yes
Albert: also reduce results if you put in quotes get exact result for example, a lot more filters help narrow down faster, more efficiently
Albert: in search, it will search in accordance it filters and give suggestions to help narrow down, which is very helpful to narrow down
Albert: not knowing term exactly, assisted search to help find, really helps. if term without much background knowledge
LS: assist user to find what want, with new ranges, options, etc. put into propsed pattern changes
+1
<Albert> +1