Meeting minutes
Well-known URI proposal for accessibility.
meeting proposed on web security
meeting scheduled
TPAC - well populated
https://
discussion at TPAC< suggesiton RQTF should investigate
info forwrded to APA
IETF mechanism a better fit
EO involved, just acccessibility for now
Why talk with web security: what two kinds of content under accessibility
- human readable
- well-fromated metadata
next steps - bring back to this taskforce as informaiton/advisory TPAC review
one other thing EO asked for: canvas/where do we have metadata right now?
APA taking week after TPAC off, does RQTF?
makes sense for RQTF too
Contrast research request from Accessibility Guidelines Working Group.
jasonjgw: To investigate different approaches for evaluating color contrast for WCAG 3
jgwWanting research to be conducted
… Accessibility Australia are working out the details
scott_h: Just chatted with Rachael and discussed how to go at it
… Have the university link to create formal research
… Offered for staff to test method and analysis, etc
… There's still some lack of clarity in AG about what's needed, but we're getting there
… We'll look for any available research, and make a plan for what's needed
… It's preliminary, but we're underway
jasonjgw: Notes it's a well defined problem -- somethng we like!
… Perhaps a report in October?
scott_h: Sure
Collaboration Tools Accessibility User Requirements.
jason has worked through all COGA comments nad noted first impressions
further comments welcome
Janina did significant edits
https://
Scott's list helpful, but needed significant editing to amke it work
broading assistive technologies rather than screen reader
avodiing naming partiuclar products - better to identify types of problems
quesiton: when to reference 2.2 instead of 2.1?
answer: assuming recommendaiton, should move to 2.2
another suggestion: add pointers to ATAG
sevarl more rounds of review required
guidance neds to go beyond WCAG - include ATAG, ARIA< etc
also oint of interest - pointss are paid as each point has 'needs to be on' and 'needs to turn off'
restructure: put under complexity?
perhaps a table for similaar contnet, but also want to make the point
more complexity to come, intentions to provide large language model based assistance in code authroing and text authoring: another level of UI
scott_h: Notes Ms embedding Code Pilot in Win 11
jasonjgw: Believe both Ms and Google are testing integrating AI into office suites
generating AI with multi modal
raja: Especially with respect to multi-modal
need to understand what is generated: music, pictures, etc.
raja Can create music, pictures, but cannot understand or describe
but cannot describe what is made - can make pictures form keywords, but can't describe the pictures
or can create audiot files but can't caption them
raja; Can't describe the pictures, but can't caption the audio files they create. Have to add a layer
raja: we want speech captioned, and pictures described; still issues with generative AI
issue at the moment
<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.
jasonjgw: Key is for authors to check that what AI produces matches what they produced and asked for
prompt engineering
raja: Understand with text, but I'm trying to generate video -- but I don't know what the audio track is saying
discussion - making a video or picture, but not sure what it's saying
non-human collaborator content needed
jasonjgw: notes corporations are going to be pragmatic about this kind of included tech; but also risk averse
y week after TPAC: decide if changes shoudl be merged
ACTION: Scott and Jason to review edits
<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.
<gb> Cannot create action. Validation failed. Maybe one of the names is not a valid user for w3c/rqtf?
Miscellaneous updates and topics.
jasonjgw: normally we take week following TPAC off, what's the sense here?
[discussion to meet or not]
jasonjgw: Suggests deciding on the 18th