<Jennie> *Thanks Eric!
Rachael notes that there will be training in August; there will be 3 new groups; motion, content order, timing and interruptions.
<Rachael> Draft AG meeting process: https://
<Rachael> Early example link: w3c/
<Rachael> 3 subgroups that are starting: Harm from motion Monday 8 am for 8 weeks
Rain: individuals should note that each group is a commit of about 4 hours/week
<Rachael> Content Order Monday 10 Eastern
<Rachael> Timing and interruptions Mondays at 12 noon eastern
Julie: We have gone through content usable, looking for sprint teams. Rachael: sent to either AG Plan or Wilco and Rachael.
Lisa: Everyone can review these documents ahead of time for next week when we'll walk through it.
Rachael: please connect with me if interested in the subgroups at any point
<julierawe> Here is the doc that Katy and I put together of the parts of Content Usable that are relevant to the new WCAG 3 sprint groups: https://
<Lisa> nect item
<Lisa> next item
<Rain> Link to next version of content useable, restructure proposal: https://
Rain: Looking for feedback by July 6th but need more subgroup input. Ideally by Wednesday.
Rain: The ask... #1. Task force to review by Wednesday...
Rachael and Rain talk about how the document would be structure; 1 document that allows better version control. But different documents would be a potential way to address different needs.
Rain: Meet on the 20th to review existing, and new comments.. with Justine and Eric? Yes, they can meetup.
<Rain> Thursday July 20th time is 11am ET / 8am PT -- join link same as for this meeting: https://
Julie asked Rain about the new structure wrt smaller numbers of objectives?
Rain explained the proposed changes; reduced structure plus a custom view of content, role, etc. This is based on the card sorts from earlier; there was a diverse range of expectations.
<Lisa> next item
Lisa: Jenny and Lisa review the CTAUR comment and editing history so far. There may not be enough text around user requirement (yet).
<julierawe> +1 to Rain's suggestion
<JustineP> +1 to Rain
+1 to rain
<Rain> +1 to add neurodiverse to the document
<Jennie> * And Jennie was paraphrasing suggestions made by COGA members in a variety of documents
Lisa: Walked through the existing comments and brought up the ones where there was ambiguity or a lack of clarity (e.g. what does WYSIWYG mean to most people, adding more text around content usable, adding or changing individual words or definitions, expanding suggested requirements)
<Jennie> Looks really good Lisa!
Lisa: Proposal; send the document to the list, especially John and Shawn, to ensure everyone is comfortable with it. By end of week for review.
<Lisa> next item
Lisa: Tasks/Action item updates as well as subgroups.
Lisa: Reminder, review issue papers on conversational interfaces, and wayfinding (per Actoin item)
Lisa: Mental Health group... David: the page is cleaned up, the additional analysis is in-progress (no time commit yet to finish). Additional paper review mostly done.
Lisa: Making content usable is slightly late, but should be done in good order and done soon.
Lisa and Jenny talked about Images subgroup; there have been scheduling difficulties but working forward.
Working with WCAG 3: Discuss Clear language tasks
W3C and Internationalization: Katie to co-chair but looking for a co-lead and is recruiting for the group.
Julie may be able to co-lead with Katie (short term).
Testing Strategy: Jennie to add current draft. Group on hold for now.
<Jennie> Have a good week!