Meeting minutes
Agenda
Kaz: we should talk about transition to PR
Minutes Review
<kaz> Feb-9
Lagally: anything to change in the minutes?
… call notes are approved
PR Transition Schedule
<kaz> Publication schedule
Lagally: what is our schedule
McCool: May 17th we should start work on the PR document
… our deadline to submit is june first
… we have been using that for the dev meeting
<kaz> Dev Meeting page
Lagally: we need to align the schedule document
Lagally: what do we need to do for keep the dates
McCool: we have to remove the at risk items now
Lagally: is May 17th good for TD?
Ege: yes
McCool: we can create a PR now and merge in main call
Kaz: which at risk features to be covered and until when do we meet?
Lagally: where is dev meeting in the schedule
Lagally: why not moving the deadline for PR transition to end of april
McCool: we can change the submission deadline to may 10th for arch but we cannot change td
Lagally: let's write it in the schedule and make it clear
McCool: the final date depends on w3m
Lagally: we freeze contribs on may 10, have 1 week to remove at risk, then we ask for review from the WG
… may 24th is when we have resolution in the main call
… with that we have june 1st for PR publication (if everything goes well)
Slides Review for Dev Meetup
<kaz> Slides information
McCool: we have introduction and then the assertion explanation
Lagally: the list is only internal
McCool: along the way, we have realized that some assertions are not clear
McCool: I have opened an issue about it
Lagally: it is a spec bug but we should check to not break the one implementing it
McCool: another one is also a bug but it is an editorial one
McCool: feel free to edit but do not change the structure
Issues by PR transition
<kaz> Issues marked as "by PR transition"
Lagally: michael do you have time to work on these?
McCool: yes I can, it has high priority
McCool: why do we have unmerged prs?
PR 886
<kaz> PR 886 - Revise (D)TLS-1-2 assertions
McCool: already approved by PLH
(got some merge conflicts)
McCool: these merge conflicts are wrong, I will fix them
… can we agree to merge once I fix those?
PR 876
<kaz> PR 876 - Remove section outline from abstract
<kaz> PR 890 - Update At-Risk-Requirements.md
Lagally: let's fix merge conflicts, the PR is approved
PR 890
<kaz> PR 890 - Update At-Risk-Requirements.md
McCool: it is outdated
Lagally: we can just merge it
<kaz> [adjourned]