Meeting minutes
Review Recommendations Report ahead of presenting to AGWG tomorrow, January 31
JenStrickland: Wendy and Tzviya went through slides since last meeting, looking clean
<JenStrickland> Google Slides Recommendations Report link: https://
JenStrickland: Going through slides, please add comments during call.
… AGWG meeting tomorrow at 11:00 Boston , please attend if you can.
Just six slides, others welcome to present.
Group consensus for Jen to present.
tzviya: Can we anticipate questions we might anticipate?
Jen: please be encouraged to add comments to slide.
[jen walks through slides]
tzviya: "ethical web design" was a topic from last week and includes much more than accessibility...
HRB is going to get the most discussed proposition
Jen: speed can be one of the values at tension with equitable
bruce shares impression from "ethical design systems" from last week
jen: so much more than we talk about and try in keep in conversation
bruce: i noticed HRB is not action / next stem item -- that might make conversation easier?
tzviya: we do not have a good definition of equity , so that is a stumbling block , but people asking are not looking at bigger picture
Jen: for conversation tomorrow, emphasize that definition can come from community group
Danielle suggests some tweaks for bullet on definition activity
[moving to next steps slide] Jen: community group can work on definition
PWE meeting is just before AGWG
tzviya: early important action item is charter for CG
Jen: Do we agree with presenting to other W3C groups?
tzviya: "Office ours Tuesdays" , coordination calls on Wednesdays
[discussion on "chairs" versus "facilitators"]
JenStrickland: other questions or suggestions ?
Danielle: How do distinguish between process and outcome?
Danielle: more concrete outcome objective might come out of CG conversations
JenStrickland: Is there consequences for lack of equity ?
tzviya: Omnibudman process improvements will help ... AGWG has had recent conversation
… PWE cannot fix everything, but is improving. Behavior like micro aggressions are hard to address
Jen: Any changes for recommendations?
Bruce asks about logistics with AG making recomendation to APA ? But Sheri recommended last week.
Jen: Progressive enhancement might have implications for performance group.
tzviya: That input could happen from Horizontal Review...
… one of the equity issue is that there are equity concerns for WCAG and AG.
wendyreid: It is important to keep track of where this activity and discussion came from...
… there are some tensions, but this activity came from AG face-to-face conversation , and wanting to keep equity better in WCAG 3 (as compared to 2).
JenStrickland: We might recrute Jenne Spellman as she was early adovcate with silver...
… but I have also seen with CSS activities...
… equity needs to be cross-group , equity more than just AGWG. But AGWG at least started this activity.