W3C

– DRAFT –
WoT Testfest - Day 3

14 December 2022

Attendees

Present
Daniel_Peintner, Ege_Korkan, Fady_Salama, Jan_Romann, Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Lagally, Michael_McCool, Ryuichi_Matsukura, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
-
Chair
McCool
Scribe
mlagally

Meeting minutes

Review of closed PRs

<kaz> PR 500 - Remove old Fujitsu

McCool: #500 is about removal of duplicate impl

<kaz> PR 502 - Update Playground.csv to include jsonld expansion limit

McCool: there were some new results on playground in #502

<kaz> PR 504 - Update node-wot.csv to include TuyaBearerTokens and mixed direction

McCool: some node-wot updates in #504

<kaz> PR 506 - Do not include removed TDs in validation script

McCool: #506 is a tooling fix
… The implementation reports were updated to include these

Profile

PR 509

<kaz> PR 509 - fix: use "pass" instead of "impl" for Profile

McCool: PR 509 is an update for node-wot

Daniel: I have added several "pass" results to the results

McCool: let me update the implementation report and check the results
… I have added categorisation to the implementation report: TD, Thing, Consumer

<kaz> wot-profile/testing/inputs/categories.csv to be updated

McCool: I found several bugs, some redundancies. Some additional clarity is required, please review the comments
… For profile this is done, I'm considering to do this for other specs
… We see that we have 5 implementations
… let me push the updated impl report.

Active implementations

McCool: We have a few more active devices from Siemens
… node-wot is an eclipse project where Siemens sponsors the organisation, do we need to distinguish?

Daniel: there may be other node-wot implementations

McCool: we can merge, need to make sure we do not count twice

Directories

McCool: There are 3 PRs

<kaz> PR 510 - Calculate a number of at-risk features automatically (for Discovery)

McCool: #510 calculates the number of "at risk" items
… let's merge

<kaz> PR 511 - Update size2 discovery result for node-wot

McCool: Let's merge #511

<kaz> PR 512 - Adjust discovery test results for zion

McCool: #512 contains results for Zion, it includes several missing assertions

<kaz> PR 515 - Adjust CoRE discovery results for wot-hive

McCool: #515 CoRE discovery results

Jan: I just created that

McCool: We have 30 mins remaining - I could quickly update discovery IR

McCool: (integration and report generation work)
… we are still missing a couple of SPARQL, some unexpectedly missing results

<sebastian> sorry, I need to go

<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/447

McCool: (new PR with latest updates to IR)

<kaz> rendered version of the Discovery Implementation Report

TD

<kaz> PR 513 - New assertions for wot-experimental

McCool: #513 addresses some missing assertions
… any objections to merge? (none)

Ege: I fixed some things in ditto and the sdf generator
… also theu URI variable problem we talked about yesterday

McCool: let me install the new playground
… Ege, is there anything you would mention tomorrow

Ege: I will add the change logs for different specifications

Kaz: given the discussion so far during the testfest you McCool and Ege were working on integrating / merging - could you do this in preparation?

McCool: Yes, let's prepare for tomorrow's meeting ahead of time.

Lagally: Can we please add Interop Testing scenarios to tomorrow's agenda

McCool: yes, also next week

Kaz: Dedicated Interop tests is not required, assertion testing of specification is sufficient for this Testfest. On the other hand, if we really want to work on "WoT Interoperability Tests", we need to have some more discussion on our expectations as the whole WoT WG.

Lagally: We have assertions that contain consumer and Things - these define the interop tests

McCool: 19 at-risk assertions in TD.
… aob?
… (meeting adjourned)

<kaz> [adjourned]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 196 (Thu Oct 27 17:06:44 2022 UTC).