Meeting minutes
Nadalin: register for TPAC if you're going
… we're on for Monday, Sept. 12
… meeting with Payments WG Tuesday, open sessions Wednesday
wseltzer: Please register whether you plan to attend in-person or remotely
Nadalin: we'd like to publish our WD01 of Level 3 sometime before TPAC
… is there a publishing moratorium?
wseltzer: upcoming, the week of TPAC
nadlin: looking to publish the first draft with new PRs
… can publish at any time
… think about publishing after our next meeting
… in 2 weeks
PRs
nadalin: 1784
… editorial
matthewmiller: editorial, let's merge
nadalin: no objections? merged
nadalin: 1776
elundberg: looks good
nadalin: objections? merge it
nadalin: 1755
… ready to go unless someone else wants to look at it
… objections?
… merge it
nadalin: 1733
akshay: still reviewing
nadalin: let's hold off
nadalin: 1663, dpk, still in progress
nadalin: Untriaged. 1774
elundberg: has dependencies, let's wait
… please review
nadalin: 1773
elundberg: aims to provide some more precise terminology
… large, so worth reviewing
… also depends on 1771
akshay: why are we doing 1774?
elundberg: trying to clarify UV, mostly for case where you set UV Preferred
… don't know if we want to be this prescriptive
… but apparently people do misuse them
johnbradley: probably not the best to set expectation of how it behaves based on how registered
elundberg: probably worth having a note to store UV bit
nadalin: 1773
elundberg: just needs some review
nadalin: 1772, backup state bits
nadalin: 1771
elundberg: editorial
… this will break some link anchors
nadalin: any objection to doing it?
elundberg: more review?
nadalin: until next meeting
nadalin: 1768
elundberg: also fixes some text in extension section
untriaged issues
nadalin: 1783
elundberg: 1783 was closed by its opener
nadalin: 1782
matthewmiller: any formatting for cddl ?
… to help syntax standout
nina: suggest raising issue with bikeshed
matthewmiller: I'll close this
nadalin: 1779
elundberg: we've gotten this request before, unreliable
nina: it's worth considering
johnbradley: we need platforms to support credential management
… then some flag might be a nice add-on
[discussion]
nadalin: leave it open
nadalin: 1766
dveditz: we're looking at this
… IDs woudl be unique per-extension, stable
… similar to identity API
nadalin: should we close in favor of the webextension issue?
martin: we would need to update webauthn spec for it to be supported
nadalin: look again in 2 weeks
[adjourned]