18:48:35 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #webauthn
18:48:35 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/07/27-webauthn-irc
18:48:38 <Zakim> RRSAgent, make logs Public
18:48:38 <Zakim> Meeting: Web Authentication WG
18:59:39 <dveditz> dveditz has joined #webauthn
19:00:57 <matthewmiller> matthewmiller has joined #webauthn
19:01:51 <nina> nina has joined #webauthn
19:03:19 <wseltzer> present+
19:03:59 <wseltzer> present+ DavidTurner, Nadalin, Nina, elundberg, dveditz, JohnBradley, JohnPascoe, MatthewMiller
19:04:17 <elundberg> elundberg has joined #webauthn
19:06:06 <wseltzer> Nadalin: register for TPAC if you're going
19:06:28 <wseltzer> ... we're on for Monday, Sept. 12
19:06:48 <wseltzer> ... meeting with Payments WG Tuesday, open sessions Wednesday
19:07:03 <wseltzer> present+ Akshay, MartinKreichgauer
19:08:01 <wseltzer> wseltzer: Please register whether you plan to attend in-person or remotely
19:08:16 <wseltzer> Nadalin: we'd like to publish our first WD sometime before TPAC
19:08:54 <wseltzer> ... is there a publishing moratorium?
19:09:01 <wseltzer> wseltzer: upcoming, the week of TPAC
19:09:19 <wseltzer> s/first WD/WD01 of Level 3/
19:10:04 <wseltzer> nadlin: looking to publish the first draft with new PRs
19:10:13 <wseltzer> ... can publish at any time
19:10:39 <wseltzer> ... think about publishing after our next meeting
19:10:46 <wseltzer> ... in 2 weeks
19:12:36 <wseltzer> topic: PRs
19:12:47 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1784
19:12:55 <wseltzer> ... editorial
19:13:29 <wseltzer> matthewmiller: editorial, let's merge
19:13:35 <wseltzer> nadalin: no objections? merged
19:13:40 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1776
19:13:56 <wseltzer> regrets+ sbweeden
19:14:45 <wseltzer> elundberg: looks good
19:14:57 <wseltzer> nadalin: objections? merge it
19:15:36 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1755
19:15:53 <wseltzer> ... ready to go unless someone else wants to look at it
19:16:04 <wseltzer> ... objections?
19:16:08 <wseltzer> ... merge it
19:16:35 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1733
19:16:49 <wseltzer> akshay: still reviewing
19:16:55 <wseltzer> nadalin: let's hold off
19:17:18 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1663, dpk, still in progress
19:18:16 <wseltzer> nadalin: Untriaged. 1774
19:18:36 <wseltzer> elundberg: has dependencies, let's wait
19:18:44 <wseltzer> ... please review
19:18:53 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1773
19:19:52 <wseltzer> elundberg: aims to provide some more precise terminology
19:20:00 <wseltzer> ... large, so worth reviewing
19:20:07 <wseltzer> ... also depends on 1771
19:20:38 <wseltzer> akshay: why are we doing 1774?
19:21:21 <wseltzer> elundberg: trying to clarify UV, mostly for case where you set UV Preferred
19:22:30 <wseltzer> ... don't know if we want to be this prescriptive
19:22:50 <wseltzer> ... but apparently people do misuse them
19:24:12 <wseltzer> johnbradley: probably not the best to set expectation of how it behaves based on how registered
19:24:54 <wseltzer> elundberg: probably worth having a note to store UV bit
19:25:16 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1773
19:25:35 <wseltzer> elundberg: just needs some review
19:26:15 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1772, backup state bits
19:27:58 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1771
19:28:06 <wseltzer> elundberg: editorial
19:29:10 <wseltzer> ... this will break some link anchors
19:29:33 <wseltzer> nadalin: any objection to doing it?
19:30:05 <wseltzer> elundberg: more review?
19:30:10 <wseltzer> nadalin: until next meeting
19:30:17 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1768
19:30:33 <wseltzer> elundberg: also fixes some text in extension section
19:31:26 <wseltzer> topic: untriaged issues
19:31:29 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1783
19:31:57 <wseltzer> elundberg: 1783 was closed by its opener
19:32:27 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1782
19:32:43 <wseltzer> matthewmiller: any formatting for cddl ?
19:33:10 <wseltzer> ... to help syntax standout
19:33:17 <wseltzer> nina: suggest raising issue with bikeshed
19:33:39 <wseltzer> matthewmiller: I'll close this
19:34:21 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1779
19:34:46 <wseltzer> elundberg: we've gotten this request before, unreliable
19:35:25 <wseltzer> nina: it's worth considering
19:36:08 <wseltzer> johnbradley: we need platforms to support credential management
19:36:29 <wseltzer> ... then some flag might be a nice add-on
19:43:41 <wseltzer> [discussion]
19:48:08 <wseltzer> nadalin: leave it open
19:48:24 <wseltzer> nadalin: 1766
19:49:36 <wseltzer> dveditz: we're looking at this
19:49:56 <wseltzer> ... IDs woudl be unique per-extension, stable
19:50:16 <wseltzer> ... similar to identity API
19:58:56 <wseltzer> nadalin: should we close in favor of the webextension issue?
19:59:38 <wseltzer> martin: we would need to update webauthn spec for it to be supported
20:00:10 <wseltzer> nadalin: look again in 2 weeks
20:00:22 <wseltzer> [adjourned]
20:00:29 <wseltzer> rrsagent, make logs publi
20:00:31 <wseltzer> rrsagent, make logs public
20:00:36 <wseltzer> rrsagent, draft minutes
20:00:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/27-webauthn-minutes.html wseltzer