Meeting minutes
<Lauriat> Checking https://
review the surveys for AG next week
jeanne: Notes several surveys to respond to this week
<jeanne> Survey email => https://
jeanne: 3 this week
jeanne: First from Protocols group
jeanne: Breaks down differences and requests preferred direction
jeanne: Also note that surveys are closing 30 minutes ahead of the AG call
jeanne: Second we will talk about shortly
jeanne: Third relates to the AG proposed charter
new subgroup participation
<jeanne> Subgroup handbook
jeanne: Notes first put forward a couple weeks ago; these are time boxed to 8 weeks
jeanne: Available subgroups are listed and participation solicited
jeanne: Thjese are setup to help inform TPAC discussion and decisioning
jeanne: Seeking 4-6 people per group; expect 4 hours per week
jeanne: Lists groups---
jeanne: Scoping -- will examine using SEO
jeanne: test types and terminology -- which has been our migration conversation in great part
jeanne: Equity -- Ways to better support different pwd groupings
jeanne: Want to define problems and use cases against we can test candidate conformance solutions
jeanne: Also Accessibility Supported
<jenniferS> I'd like to support Equity.
jeanne: Issue Severity
jeanne: Notes als that group telecon scheduling is in the survey
Rachael: Reinforces 8 week time box; will come back to AG conversation;
maryjom: 4 hours may be difficult as am starting up WCAG2ICT work
jeanne: Understood, and thanks for work you're doing!
jenniferS: Asks how to choose what group?
<jeanne> Survey
jeanne: Anyone unable to access WBS, please let Jeanne know asap
continuing the migration categorization exercise
<jeanne> spreadsheet for Migration
janina: Notes my review of 2.2.6 doesn't fit a good approach for 3.0
Lauriat: Also ran into challenges, no objective or conditional tests that I can thank of
Lauriat: Inherently so high level that it depends on how the content works
Lauriat: Seems all we can say is support multiple ways
Lauriat: Appears no opportunity to be perscriptive
Lauriat: Would want to say need to switch from using keyboard to mouse, and other combos; but possibly too many permutations to list out
jeanne: Think we need to write this up as a use case
jeanne: A good example of objective test problem
<Lauriat> https://
Lauriat: 2.4.5 multiple ways have some examples written up
Lauriat: notes protocols could be declared to help ensure this can happen
Lauriat: but don't see an ACT type breakdown
<Zakim> Lauriat, you wanted to describe the interesting challenge I've had with multiple ways & concurrent input mechanisms
jeanne: Suggest to Rachael capturing some of these challenges could be helpful
Rachael: Will start Google Doc to do so
Rachael: Also ran into different challenges with Visible Controls; some pass fail, but not everywhere; different levels of test types
<jeanne> New Use Cases document
jeanne: Encourages people to add a para about challenges encountered in this exercise
Rachael: suggests a second part to capture lessons learned
jeanne: Suggests people pick another SC still unaddressed and repeat our process with it
jeanne: 24 remain
jeanne: Please put 'partial' and your name so that it's evident you're working on it
ToddL: Took on 2.5.5 and 2.5.8 -- when do we meet as a group on these again?
jeanne: We're doing them individually for now. Too many for now
jeanne: Though group efforts are welcome
jeanne: Noting a link error -- but suggests Google Drive if such are encountered
jeanne: Asks if anyone wants a small group breakout room?
[crickets]
<jenniferS> I just had an urgent PDF remediation ask pop up, gotta run! Have a good weekend!
<ToddL> I need edit permission on the doc I am going to be editing, please. Thank you.
jeanne: Invites people to return to group discussion--questions? comments?
tod: Need edit access
sarahhorton: wondering--concerned about specificity of functional and user needs; should we focus on categories, not subcategories?
sarahhorton: found myself at the higher level just to be able to move forward
jeanne: also did that; I think it's ok
jeanne: It's a judgement call
sarahhorton: was wondering whether others have had that challenge
jeanne: at some point a group will take another pass and work on these
Lauriat: Also finding it useful to go for high level
<Rachael> Reading level was a counter example where it really applies specifically to written language
Lauriat: I found a couple exceptions; but mostly highest broadest possible
<Zakim> Lauriat, you wanted to offer On Input example for functional & user needs: https://
Lauriat: Also +1 that this is a first pass and will be revisited
jeanne: thanks everyone!