Meeting minutes
Action items
Norm: JWL did the actions, and the fixes have been pushed
Status reports
Norm: My GLL implementation is partially working.
John: I am passing all the tests, plus insertions.
Steven: I thought there was a test with comments everywhere.
John: No.
Norm: Does sound familiar.
John: Insertions have been interesting.
Steven: Testing?
Norm: I've committed tests with newlines fixed
John: Newline handling -- some tests it adds more ambiguity
Norm: That's a bug. Please let me know so I can fix it.
Issues
Steven: Working from https://
Steven: I am fighting with git.
Norm: I will commit it.
Steven: It's on my staging site.
Norm: I want to go back to calling it "attribute" not unstructured.
ACTION: Steven to revert wording to attribute
Norm: Forbidding xmlns as an attribute
Michael: we don't need to
Norm: It would be clearer if we were explicit
ACTION: Steven to add wording forbidding xmlns
Norm: Issue 26, ambiguity
Michael: I'm sorry to reraise this. The current wording troubles me.
… the point is that conforming processors are allowed to behave differently
… also the current wording is not true
… none of the algorithms we mention define ambiguity.
ACTION: Steven to insert Michael's ambiguity text
<norm> https://
Michael: last comment on that thread
John: What is the meaning of ambiguity
Michael: We don't define that. There is a gap between the standard definition, and our spec.
… if a rule produces empty in two different ways, is a matter of how you produce the parse tree.
Norm: I think we are closed for 1.0 spec, and sign off next week in time for Prague.
Michael: Great!
AOB
Michael: How do we make the best possible splash?
Bethan: Mascots!
Steven: An XML made of glass.
Bethan: A ghost animal?
Norm: We need a slot on the program.
ACTION: Steven to contact Prague.
Steven: We need a resources pointer -- where to get implementations, example grammars
Steven: I am giving the ixml tutorial at Prague
Bethan: Cheshire cat
… not in copyright
Norm: We plan to do a session at Balisage. We should do that. It's all virtual
… we need to work on what we want to do for pubs and PR for Prague and Balisage
[ADJOURN]
f/fix/fix/
<norm> If you're stll there, Steven, I don't see the version declaration in the 17 May draft
OK. Did you add that, or was that a action for me?
I can add it
<norm> It was issue 78 which we agreed to last week, I thought you already had that acttion.
ACTION: Steven to add version declaration
<norm> (Last week or the week before, the text and grammar changes are in the pull request so it should be easy.)
<norm> Fab. Thank you.