Meeting minutes
<RiccardoAlbertoni> RSAgent, draft minutes
<RiccardoAlbertoni> PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://
approve last meeting minutes
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
+1
<DaveBrowning> +1
RESOLUTION: approve last meeting minutes
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
approve agenda
RiccardoAlbertoni: Any proposed changes?
[none]
Updates from last plenary
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: Publication of 4PWD was approved.
… The issue of wide review was raised (see link above).
… And also the one of the horizontal review - i.e., from other W3C WGs.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: About horizontal review, we have specific checklists.
… The first one ^^ is about i18n.
… There are many not relevant for DCAT, but a couple of them are.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: The first one is about some issues opened by i18n about DCAT ^^
… We partially replied to it, but we didn't address the point about direction metadata.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: About this, options on how to do this in RDF is discussed in a specific document ^^
… As this approach is not part of a REC, so we can keep the issue open, and move it to future work.
… When an "official" solution will be available, it can be adopted in DCAT.
proposed: Keep open https://
<DaveBrowning> +1
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
+1
RESOLUTION: Keep open https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> “The document available at https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: Maybe we can add comment to issue ^^
+1
<DaveBrowning> +1
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: The other issue ^^
… The comment is about ISO language codes instead of URIs for language.
… There was some discussion on this thread, and some proposals to address the issue.
… I wonder whether what we proposed can be considered as the solution.
… Or rather we should ping again i18n to get their feedback.
AndreaPerego: They didn't provide feedback, so either we ping them, or ask PLH what to do.
… In any case, using blank nodes instead of URIs raises a number of issues, also in terms of linked data principles.
… And we have official code lists about languages, where each language definition also include the ISO codes.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: i18n also raised an issue about the problem literals vs URIs mentioned by Addison ^^
AndreaPerego: My feeling is that we are stuck here, since we need the feedback from Addison.
RiccardoAlbertoni: I suggest we then add a comment to the issue asking Addison to provide the text for this "health warning".
AndreaPerego: No harm doing that, but I wonder whether we should ask first PLH which approach is best.
DaveBrowning: It may well be the case that the "health warning" solves the problem, but this needs to be done by looking at the current situation - the issue have been hanging for quite a while.
… This is also something to be asked to PLH.
RiccardoAlbertoni: All right, let's discuss with PLH.
… I suggest anyway we add a comment to the issue, trying to get in touch again with Addison.
proposed: About https://
proposed: About https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
<DaveBrowning> +1
+1
RESOLUTION: About https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: I was checking checklists filled in by some WG for some inspiration.
… The WoT ^^ even expanded the checklist. Not sure we should do that.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> Finalizing a11y checklist [https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: I also started other checklists.
… The a11y one is mostly not relevant to DCAT, AFAICT.
RiccardoAlbertoni: DaveBrowning, you did something on privacy and security?
DaveBrowning: We have the section in the spec, where we basically say we don't deal with these issues.
… Not sure we did more than that.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: The security checklist ^^
AndreaPerego: I have the impression that we just have one answer to all the questions: privacy and security issues can be related to which type of information a data provider expose via DCAT, but not on DCAT itself.
… Maybe we can ask PLH which is the best way to answer to the checklist - considering that the answer will be basically the same.
RiccardoAlbertoni: Actually, I had the impression that some of the guidelines we are providing in terms of the use of DCAT may be relevant from the privacy and security point of view.
DaveBrowning: I will have a look at the privacy and security checklist.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
AndreaPerego: I will look at the architecture one.
DaveBrowning: About talking with PLH, I suggest we devote some time during the plenary.
AndreaPerego: +1
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
[meeting adjourned]