Meeting minutes
Chair Sheri
<jlkline> here
/me Try 'present+' like this ...
<Sheri_B-H> Janina, can you post the meeting link again here? Jeff and I are on the old link
<Sheri_B-H> also MaryJo is on the old link
New Zoom: https://
<Sheri_B-H> That's the link to the page that I can't get to, I need the actual zoom link
<jlkline> 988 3484 3716
<Sheri_B-H> Meeting ID says it requires a passcode
<Sheri_B-H> yes I refreshed - there is a problem because I have two IDs and I suspect the permissions were granted to my non-work ID
<jlkline> i have the passcode
<jlkline> 1 sec
<jlkline> 341074
Review Dimensionâ– s Structure and Reconcile Inconsistencies
Sheri: apologies for missing recent calls; much reorg at work ...
sheri: Are there outstanding proposals?
jeff: Not a problem with structure; was concerned with consistency and actionable proof points
jeff: Knowledge and skills doesn't seem particularly actionable
sheri: Unfortunately, no Jake today
sheri: Recalls glossary still not finished. We need definitions for terms not defined elsewhere
sheri: reviews existing glossary ...
sheri: need to make sure what we have is complete
jeff: wasn't aware it would be so specific; thought generic to the doc
sheri: so that people would have terms before reading the doc
jeff: haven't formatted to include definitions
sheri: e.g. cicd
janina: notes usual practice on defitionsack ja
janina: I'll take up with APA management as how best to handle for both objectives--not too many in the main glossary, but definitions within dimensions as needed
sheri: looks at some candidate definitions --- which to keep
sheri: looks for any conflicts ...
mary jo: proofpoint used throughout the doc; one word? two words? Camel case?
sheri suggests standard 2 word grammar approach
[group agrees]
sheri: will take care globally
sheri: question re "accomodations" U.S. definition? Something more general world wide?
sheri: any other inconsistencies we need to close out?
sheri: I have been trying to catch Euro specific ones ...
mary jo offers to review detail review
sheri: notes david has previously looked at comments.
maryjo: notes lots of suggested changes still in the doc ...
jeff: asks about ISO 3071
jeff: someone also mentioned another on usability
jeff: suggests we finish fpwd with what we think, then go back and look whether any conflicts
sheri: wasn't there an agreement to present on the ISO doc to us?
sheri: we're 60 pages, their's about 150; we will need to consider conflicts
jeff: believe only in the development area
jeff: no detail on policy or procurement
sheri: I'll check
sheri: if we have some, we'll pursue a joint meeting
sheri: need to clean up open questions section: Sec. 1.5
jeff: so far we've only asked for feedback within w3c?
sheri: correct, but that's why we should revisit
maryjo: don't understand the items
sheri: we have multiple schemes
sheri: so we have 3 ways of displaying info; we thought we should get feedback on which approach to adopt
jeff: thought this was a working action item
sheri: e.g. we're often asked to show where we are to make something a11y; sometimes under nda; not always
jeff: allows for tracking data, etc., to get auto pulled out and made available
Review Any Recent Edits By Group Members
sheri asks mj if she knows where changes are?
unreviewed changes in communications dimension; Sec. 3.1 -- jeff picking up from lauri
mary_jo: also inconsistent in commas
janina: APA's a fan of Oxford
sheri: Done. we'll use Oxford commas
multimedia as well as captions, etc ...
do we want a link to training?
jeff: discussed ... suggested training proof points where useful
sheri: I prefer links because it's easier
jeff: argues knowledge and skills isn't specific to any dimensionjeff: will be traveling 4 May; but will try to be here at least part