Meeting minutes
agenda
<kaz> Extension plan
Kaz: note that we need to think about the updated publication timeline again.
minutes
<kaz> Mar-10
Lagally: let's review March
10 minutes...
… looked at draft impl report, merged three PRs,
looked at some issues, terminology, scripting API (partial
TD)
Lagally: if no
objections...
… approved
schedule
<kaz> Extension plan
Kaz: we need to update
this every couple of weeks
… CR candidate is March 30, probably too close,
let's review at end of call
PR 723
<mlagally> PR 723 - Answers to Security and Privacy Questionnaire
McCool: need to fix directory, give me a sec
Implementation report
PR 707 - WIP: Implementation Report
McCool: need to do some
update for the script
… not really ready for review yet
… but Editors to start to review it
… maybe need to talk about sections of
assertions
Lagally: all the TDs are not necessarily for TD 1.1
McCool: reasonable to see
compatibility as well
… 2 sections for testimonials
Lagally: how to handle implementations from non-Members?
McCool: there are issues of
categorizations as well
… we're not asking for testimonials
… (from non-Members?)
Lagally: for example, we should remove SmartThings, who already left W3C
McCool: can delete the resources
Lagally: yes, please delete the resources for non-Members
McCool: on the other hand, how to deal with compatibility tests is an issue
Lagally: (goes through the assertions)
Lagally: (also shows the Issue 725 to check the progress)
Issue 725 - Implementation report - remaining tasks
Lagally: (adds several new check points)
Rendered version of the draft implementation report
Lagally: who should be listed as the Editors?
McCool: should remove people who have already left
Kaz: Editors should be
those who edit the document
… people who made contributions for implementations
should be Contributors
tou: Editors of the Architecture spec should be included
Lagally: agree
McCool: will update
it
… Michael Lagally, Matsukura-san, Toumura-san and
myself
Matsukura: would like to make contribution but I'm not really active recently...
McCool: you could add implementation reports
Lagally: if you could provide an updated report...
McCool: there is a template on the wot-testing repo
Matsukura: ok
… will provide additional information
Lagally: need to ask ERCIM about their contribution
McCool: should ask all the previous contributors about their intention
Lagally: (updates the check points issue)
contributions
PR 722
<kaz> PR 722 - Merge "4. Device Categories" section into "3. Terminology" section
Lagally: move device categories to terminology: merged
PR 721
<kaz> PR 721 - Change "Thing Directory" to "Thing Description Directory"
Lagally: updates Thing Description Directory terminology
PR 720
<kaz> PR 720 - Update list of editors
Lagally: revise list of editors - merging
PR 701
<kaz> PR 701 - Update Implementation Report link in SOTD
McCool: do we want to use report11 or report?
Lagally: either is fine, let's merge it
McCool: sure, and look at this again later when the impl report is more up to date
PR 603
<kaz> PR 603 - Define and Discuss "Hubs"
Lagally: has been a draft for a while, let's merge, take remaining tasks into issues
McCool: ok, that at least cleans up some terminoligy
<mlagally> https://
Lagally: will track remaining tasks in issue 724
PR 723
<kaz> PR 723 - Answers to Security and Privacy Questionnaire
McCool: ready to merge
Lagally: merging
PR 710
<kaz> PR 710 - WIP: Explainer for Architecture 1.1
Lagally: for explainer
McCool: main thing to do is decide where
McCool: suggest we merge to at least create the directory, then I will do another PR to update
Lagally: ok
editorial notes
McCool: some are useful content that should be merged, some are issues that should be resolved (and removed)
Lagally: some are placeholders, e.g. for empty sections
McCool: we might have to remove some of the empty sections if we run out of time (and if they aren't important)
security
McCool: some of the text there should be actual assertions, and the section made normative
Lagally: does impact our schedule; how long?
McCool: mechanical part by
next week, more if we have content changes or reviews
… given four weeks, we can do updates and security
review
Lagally: ok, that means CR candidate end of May
McCool: as long as we are done before July 30 (when Discovery and Profiles are due) we should be ok
Lagally: let's put the schedule conversation at the top of the agenda for the next call
<kaz> [adjourned]