Meeting minutes
minute review
(minutes approved)
Editors call
McCool: discussion on terminology, etc.
… more discussion during the Architecture call tomorrow
WoT-JP CG
Mizushima: will organize outreach events
McCool: concrete dates?
Mizushima: will let you know once decided
tpac 2022
McCool: the main question is whether to do hybrid or virtual
… we need to think about plugfest and f2f
McCool: I want to say yes if there is no quarantine at entry
Ege: I would like to attend physically if enough people show up so that we can have longer meetings and talks
McCool: do not forget that preparing for travel and travelling takes time
Kaz: as w3c, we want to get your honest opinions, not only meeting but also socializing, fees etc.
Lagally: I am a big fan of physical meetings but a physical event this year this year seems not feasible due to covid, just a stomach feeling
McCool: we have 4 months charter extension to finalize the one year extension procedure
McCool: any further comments on the charter extension?
<kaz> (none)
publications
McCool: my understanding is that we are adding dataresponse and get WD out the door
Lagally: yes but keeping it open for the notify operation
McCool: discovery: we do not have a normative content on what the consumer should do with discovery
McCool: so that needs to be written, which pushes our feature freeze date
McCool: also somehow we have duplicate text in the schedule, will fix it
Lagally: the last dates should be PRs
McCool: that is probably why there are the duplicates
McCool: another ongoing thing is the wide review
McCool: I am doing the security and privacy questionnaire for td but I am now wondering if we should do one but link to multiple specs we are working on since there are lots of duplications
McCool: there are some small changes in the questionnaire
McCool: in the PR I also have the old questionnaire in the same readme
McCool: I think one document makes more sense
Ege: do you mean all deliverables or only the ones in the rec track?
McCool: only in the rec track
McCool: I will have a draft ready this week
Daniel: would this mean that one issue would block all documents?
McCool: if structured well, I hope it does not
Kaz: That's a possible approach, but I think it might be easier to have a template written by you, and the other Editors extend that template for their specs.
WoT CG
<kaz> guide for CG Chair selection
[[ When a group has already chosen its Chair(s), only the Chair(s) themselves see the checkboxes. Only Chairs may add or remove Chairs. Chairs may remove themselves. ]]
McCool: dr has made ege and cristiano chairs of the CG, which does not follow the process
McCool: now we have to remove them as chairs, start voting procedure
Kaz: I am talking with Dave, and would suggest (1) we once remove the update Chairs candidates wrongly nominated, and (2) we start over the official Chair selection procedure. I'll send a reminder about that to the CG mailing list about the procedure responding to Dave's message.
<kaz> Dave's message
Testing
McCool: I will run my tools to update the template
Liaisons
ITU-T Webinar
McCool: we also have the recordings of the ITU-T webinar
<kaz> Webinar page
McCool: of interest, Long Rong from China Mobile has presented what she called Thing Models but actually it is digital twins
McCool: so we should get into touch with China Mobile
McCool: we also had some geospatial discussions in the use case call
ECHONET
McCool: anything new from Echonet?
Kaz: yes, I've been working with them with them for further discussion
… FYI,they're talking with the WoT-JP CG as well, and (as Mizushima-san mentioned) there is a plan to have a joint event in March.
IRTF T2TRG
McCool: T2TRG also asked us to speak in the IETF, should be soon
<McCool> https://
McCool: we have a 15 mins slot to give updates
McCool: a bit late for japan. they are also doing some work on iot security that is of interest
McCool: aob?
<kaz> [adjourned]