W3C

– DRAFT –
WAI Coordination Call Teleconference

15 December 2021

Attendees

Present
George, James, janina, Judy, Katie_Haritos-Shea, LisaSeemanKest, stevelee, tzviya
Regrets
Becky, Chuck
Chair
-
Scribe
Joshue108, stevelee

Meeting minutes

Scribe, rssagent, agenda check -- any additions? (Please put present+ in IRC)

JB: Checks agenda

No meeting on the 29th

Next meeting on Jan 12th

JS: Looks right

Updates: publication plans, announcements https://www.w3.org/WAI/cc/wiki/WAI_Announcement_Drafts

JB: We are almost into moratorium

Anything coming out?

JN: We published last CR for ARIA last week, minor no announcement

JB: Thats fine

JS: CAPTCHA FPWD, published tomorrw?

JB: Don't know

JS: Thought we have it cleared with Shawn - not confirmed

JB: Shawn will have more availability in Jan

JS: We were hoping to publish tomorrow- can the messaging follow later?

JB: You can go ahead and we can follow on with messaging etc

JB: Anything else?

I've a question for George on ePub

TS: George has more info

Checking: New work under development, status on cross-WAI review requests

JB: Just to check new work in development - anything that was not mentioned via announcements

And if there are any cross group review requests.

Carried over: Scope of mental health issues in WAI work, not only through Coga TF

JB: Thanks Lisa for joining

JB: GIves overview of the scope of work that WAI is taking up.

Mental health is an area, that is a growing concern a la pandemic etc, and the demographics were already huge

There are relevant a11y accomodations, the COGA TF has been exploring

We may need to come back to this - want to now get a sense of how people look at the issue.

LS: <gives background>

Discussed overlap between people with cognitive issues and depression

mood disorders, etc - Renaldo did a position paper, part of thesis

We wanted more things included but didn't have strong research

Now we are doing lit review

Broadening scope to a11y related issues

We need more volunteers - then after holiidays we will review what we have

We may update Content Usable

JB: <Relays experience working in AT service provision field>

<Discussed meds and how assistive tech can support accessibility with MH conditions etc>

LS: We've been working on this for 6 months

JB: Would like to see

LS: We have a DB and lit review notes etc

<LisaSeemanKest> snapshot https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eKNrofGubnpQE6mO-vxmI-1MW5nA2LDj0LxebREPRGA/edit?resourcekey#gid=1686096268

JB: URLS?

JB: Wonders about tie ins between ARIA, and Emerging Tech etc

TZ: DIscusses the experience of Long COVID and related syndromes

many are not believed when they say they have issues

Characterised as gaslighting

Wonder if this has come up in your research Lisa?

LS: Not seen that - but we have seen many step processes difficult for those with mood disorders

Dark patterns etc exacerbate anxiety et

JB: Discusses Chronic Fatigue and ME

Screen fatigue is a real problem for this cohort

Long COVID has overlaps - similar supports may be needed

JB: Articulating user needs is tied to assembling solutions

JB: Curious, is this discussed in ePub a11y work?

Josh, Janina does this come up in emerging tech?

Or what kind of training or orientation is needed?

LS: In Personsonalization TF we like to mark up things that are distracting or disturbing

Users may have content they dont want to appear in their feeds etc

Controlling disturbances also

JB: Suppress a trigger?

LS: Do many audio pings also distracting.

<Zakim> tzviya, you wanted to ask how this might be implemented

TZ: I'm not sure how we would implement this - rather vague

We are aware of some best practice but unless documented in WCAG etc, v hard to implement

JB: Wonders about who has spent time with Content Usable

<LisaSeemanKest> https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-usable/

GK: When I read it, it seems like good practices in terms of writing

There can be different content for diff groups, not on the UI side

JS: One place we see, is with the semantic content model from personalization - we have an implementation the ADA complaint form is being marked up.

We do need a renderer

One thought from APA, is that we could apply Personalization markup to the Content usable doc would be a good idea.

JB: Ok

A distilled version of that doc is also being discussed

JS: We could get that lighter overview using these semantics.

LS: I've been involved in that discussion

JB: Asks if training on cognitive issues would be useful

TPAC shorts could be used

Anything else that would be helpful to your groups?

JB: Thanks Kim for her comments on the survey

KP: I pointed to GH issue

JB: Voice input user needs input

KP: <Discusses some details>

Having different speech users, fully dependent vs partial

But yes, I did the practical thing.

KP: When doing mobile user examples - several of those are people who use speech only - they are accurate

JB request from XR Access for collaboration on a new project maps to multiple other groups
… maybe rqtf and immersive

josh: how can we relate/work with these
… other work on interacting with XR objects and how would keyboard a11y work
… want sense of how to approach from JB

GK: publishing people would like a starting point for XR etc

josh - have a doc in progress on the wiki - will add to minutes
… Dylan refers to XOR semantics module - that is really under developed
… do we want to work on it to be a "thing"

jB there's a lot in that coordination request - including an a11y object model for XR
… my plan is to give a warm response ASAP and then defer to Josh for details
… then decide which groups to include - eg rqtf

<Joshue108_> Proof of concept for 3D interaction https://equalentry.com/interacting-with-objects-in-an-inclusive-virtual-environment/

<janina> https://wicg.github.io/aom/explainer.html

<Joshue108_> XR Semantics Module https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/XR-Semantics-Module

<Joshue108_> WebXR Standards and Accessibility Architecture Issues https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/WebXR_Standards_and_Accessibility_Architecture_Issues

TS: those communities interested in publishing and XR are working now - eg medical
… European a11y act is pushing things nicely so they HAVE to include it

josh - @George please see URI on Architecture above ^^^

TS - talk to ada-rose canon

Josh - concerned about arcitectural decision may be being made and may be brittle in terms of a11y

Carried over: Further discussion on WAI CC meeting frequency, focus, timing

JB no word back from DSPA (signing org that does training)
… any thoughts on frequency of meeting?

JN: every other week or else a long wait if you miss one

+1 to JN

<Ryladog> 12th

JB: first meeting on 2022 will be 15th Jan [Corrected] No, 12th Jan

<LisaSeemanKest> thank you!

<Ryladog> Jan 15th is a Sat

TS: nice news - Lainey Feingold @@ said WAI was a place you need to go to learn about a11y

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 185 (Thu Dec 2 18:51:55 2021 UTC).

Diagnostics

Succeeded: s/presenter/Lainey Feingold

Succeeded: s/a la pandemic etc/a la pandemic etc, and the demographics were already huge

Succeeded: s/temporary psychosis/how assistive tech can support accessibility with MH conditions/

Succeeded: s/@@@ XR/XR Access for collaboration on a new project/

Succeeded: s/dynlan/Dylan/

Succeeded: s/first meeting on 2022 will be 15th Jan (?)/first meeting on 2022 will be 15th Jan [Corrected] No, 12th Jan/

Maybe present: GK, JB, JN, josh, JS, KP, LS, TS, TZ