Meeting minutes
Minutes
<dape> https://
Daniel: last call was 27th of September
… we talked about test fests and topics F2F meetining
… we reviewed a PR for not found error
… minutes are fine
… any objections?
<zkis> no
<cris> no: )
Daniel: minutes approved
quick updates
F2F
Daniel: we have a session next Wednesday about Scripting API
<dape> https://
Daniel: we have 45 minutes
… we could talk about different topics: - how to configure binding layer - testfest results
… currently we support only a formIndex for interaction with bindings
… what do you think about it?
Zoltan: I'd propose a different API to interact with bindings
… maybe defined at Thing level
Daniel: what do you mean?
Zoltan: giving hints to the underlying API
… possible not per-interaction
Zoltan: WoT model is born to abstract low level interaction patterns, we shouldn't open it again
Daniel: for example the consumer only knows http therefore it should be able to communicate this to the runtime.
Kaz: What did people do during this PlugFest?
… they might provide good feedback
Daniel: true
Cristiano: maybe we can also use the option parameter to choose a particular security schema
Zoltan: yeah maybe it could be an array
… and then the runtime would throw if not security schema matches
Daniel: yeah we can provide options also to the exposer part
Cristiano: seems good
Daniel: I think we are having good points, I'll report those in the presentation to get more feedback
Zoltan: it is better to strictly define the algorithms about how the selection is done
Daniel: one topic that I want to talk about is discovery
Cristiano: the downsized the scope, it is only http right now
Daniel: ok and then we have the new Action Model
… which is missing
Zoltan: yeah we need to look at it
Daniel: we have different action models
… one "operational", in other words using op keywords
… other more based on hypermedia control
Zoltan: control objects might be a good way to describe the current spec
Cristiano: right
Daniel: similar to subscription object
Kaz: in cases where you have multiple instances you have to keep track also of who started it
… which creates complexities
Cristiano: about discovery should we implement other ways of discovery?
Zoltan: I think our API should be more focused on second phase
Daniel: I like to have a convient API please support things "around me"
Zoltan: we have a security problem there..
… in ocf this is not even allowed in one security realm.
Cristiano: should we have different endpoints for first level discovery?
Zoltan: we could but in another root object, cause I have security concerns
PRs
Daniel: we have an Open pr about alignment of typescript API with WebIDL
Cristiano: there might be an error in emitEvent
Daniel: ok to merge it?
Zoltan: ok
Kaz: ok
Daniel: thank you
<kaz> [adjourned]