W3C

– DRAFT –
Meeting Three | September 30, 2021 | Learning Words As You Go | Global Children's Accessibility Considerations Toward a Definition

30 September 2021

Attendees

Present
(Interpreter), AJ, Allison, Dan (Interpreter), David, Debbie (Interpreter), krisannekinney, Maud, SuzanneTaylor
Regrets
-
Chair
test
Scribe
SuzanneTaylor, test

Meeting minutes

test if notetaking is set up

rssagent, bye

Logistics

Interactive Orthography Presentation by David Boulton

David: Part of the time will background, then outlining the issue, then showing a demo to solve the issue
… this is specific to English, but English is spoken around the world and most other languages have similar issues, but not to the same extent
… the orthography itself is the most prevelant info tech we use today

Suzanne: What is orthography?

David: The whole mechanism of sounds, letters, words and how they fit together
… As of Feb 2020 lastest NAEP evaluation...
… majority of students are not ready to read at the grade level
… reading is slowing learning
… This is definitely worse for students of color
… There consequences are more than just learning, it causes psychological issues as well, creating aquired learning disabilities

Video: numerous experts highlight the complexity and issues caused by English itself
… demo shows that even just the letter a has a wide variety of functions
… and continues through other similar examples of oddities in English use of letter, even in elementary words

David: With that as a background, I am proposing a solution
… (rolls over words that show a more detailed set of representations of sounds, such as different colors and heights of letters)
… most students can use this set of symbols
… the demo also gives more traditional things, like definitions
… there is a verbal sounding out each word
… add it to today's newspaper and the Things Entertainment Web site
… It is a Chrome extension and can be used even to run over a very long text

Kris Anne: Does it work in e-readers?

David: Yes, we have some examples

AJ: Any plans for OCR?

David: It's more of a behind the scenes production approach right now

David: This is free and non-profit, we partner with some other organizations to recover server costs, etc

David: I think the future of words is to use the interest to change orthography
… because the code is legacy tech that can't be touched, many people don't benefit from reading as they could/should

Allison: I understand this was researched at the word level, but I'm wondering if there is any research listening comprehension vs reading comprehension

David: One way to look at it is that reading comprehension is really just an avenue to listening comprehension
… we have to get around the notion that the orthography is an immutable fixture

Allison: can you post links in the chat?

https://mlc.learningstewards.org/olsn-using/

reading deep dive: https://childrenofthecode.org/

Maud: Do you know of anyone working on this in other languages in other countries?

David: While some in other countries are using this, I don't know anyone else working in the space
… however other languages have much less need to develop complex internal interpretative skills

Maud: There is someone in France working on this, perhaps... I could look into this

David: This can be a difficult sell

Maud: I like this idea. It does fit well with the work we do in accessibility

TPAC

Suzanne: Should we present?

AJ: can we review in advance

Allison: some concrete examples would be helpful
… such as CC

Silver Friday Call

skip

Zkim, take up item 5

Continue Discussion of Working Definition of Disability / Accessibility

Maud: Learning Disabilities are defined differently country to country
… requirements for accommodations differ
… In other cases, schools might not have advances in psychology to apply
… In some cases, anything that can't be "fixed" is a disabilitiy

Maud: -continues through slides-

David: To what extent will we stay with this

Maud: That's too be discussed

David: Yes, this is great a summary of where we are now

Maud: The idea is also to have the same understanding of the current framework in order to see how we can position ourselves relative to it

Allison: I get that we probably need to stay with the definition appropriate to adults, but there is also an issue with how to define this on, say, a fourth grade level
… this way the language is appropriate to be used in a child-facing way

--David and Maud both agree that is a good idea--

Maud: There are also gender-based differences in terms of patterns, and so support has to be different based on gender
… this might not be part of the definition, but can we be sure we address this where needed
… for example girls tend to under-diagnosed with some challenges

Allison: Can we also brought to other intersectionality (gender, race, etc)

AJ: are the slides/studies adult-based?

Maud: No, all of this is about children, and the research was about children
… I did include a definition of "accessibility" in the slides, but this highlights how the definition seems to not address children

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 136 (Thu May 27 13:50:24 2021 UTC).

Diagnostics

Succeeded: s/I did include/...I did include

Maybe present: Suzanne, Video