Meeting minutes
Preliminary
Fady will moderate the Marketing call from today.
Minutes
Fady: any objections to the minutes?
<kaz> (none; approved)
Updates on tutorials
Ege: tutorial videos ongoing
McCool: should have outlines/scripts, etc., as well
Ege: similar to those already on GH
https://
Ege: we have hired someone who will do the videos. He has started this week and he is going to make a sample video this month about just JSON
Philipp: I have written these tutorials that use ESPs and WoT
… I am working on a video too
McCool: really nice tutorials
<kaz> TUM courses
Kaz: the licensing should be thought of beforehand properly. If they are TUM resources, it is better to link to the TUM website
Ege: the tutorials we are making are going to be brand new and not branded with TUM
Sebastian: we don't have to submit the tutorials to the W3C no?
Sebastian: the content on the GitHub has nothing to do with the new videos right?
Ege: that is correct. We are making things from scratch
Fady: do we have a youtube channel for WoT?
McCool: we have but it depends on the definition of we. we can post to the w3c channel and tag them with wt
Fady: i think it would be good to have one
Philipp: one concern I have about youtube is advertisement. There are ads shown that we cannot control the nature of
… and we do not get any monetary benefit until 1000 views or so
Daniel: there is a new video platform by w3c?
Kaz: there are several issues here, e.g., (1) affiliation of resources under wot-marketing including presentations and videos and (2) possible problem with advertisement on youtube.
Sebastian: let's postpone it for when we have the tutorials ready
Ege: I can delete them but I cannot make actual lectures W3C content
Pull Requests
PR 201
<kaz> PR 201 - feat: reorder and create new groups
Fady: dp you have a PR about the videos
Daniel: PR 201
Kaz: we should clarify the ownership of TUM courses
PR 89
Fady: Also there is this very old PR
McCool: I never got back from Wendy about the actual policy about non-member contributions
<kaz> PR 89 - WIP: Update README.md to define non-members contribution policies
PR 202
<kaz> PR 202 - Delete tutorials/TUM Courses directory
WoT issue 954
wot issue 954 - Setting up Discussions for WoT Repositories
https://
McCool: we should have discussions at one repo if we do want to have it
Ege: we can both but it is still not clear where to put these different platforms for communication/contact
How to handle groups?
McCool: we should not have two words on the menu items
Fady: I would not want to scroll or click to some link in order to find the contact information
Ege: we should have a shorter menu bar. Maybe standardization, activities, contact, developers, more
Kaz: we should have more discussions
Kaz: would suggest we have some more discussion on the structure design next week
<kaz> [adjourned]