Meeting minutes
Summer schedule
https://
Ted: I sent out a doodle poll to see when people are planning to be away this summer and we should cancel calls
[Ulf shares details on medical leave, the next 4-6 weeks, and participants wish him a speedy recovery]
Cfc VISSv2 FPWD
https://
Ted explains the process and expectations
Ulf: appreciate starting the process, this is encouraging for me and all of us as it has been a group process
[Ulf is primary editor and written majority of the document, along with early contributions from Patrick L and Isaac]
Peter: it is important to move along
Open issues
https://
Ulf: capture is a grouping
Ted: in addition to the Paths and static Ulf recommended for mandatory list, I think we should have time and change since they were part of VISSv1
Ulf: I agree based on that logic
Ted: I'll tag Erik and Sebastian to see if they have an opinion, won't change for FPWD but would be good to reach a conclusion
Gunnar: no strong opinion but curve and history are on my optional list
https://
Ulf: after the last meeting and learning that Bosch isn't specifying how the token is created, my own view is we could keep a common architecture for both
… my view is one architecture would be more difficult
Ted: or we have access grant server optional, you can create tokens in any manner @@bosch
Isaac: it would be worth showing multiple scenarios and how to handle grant server outside the vehicle
… as grant server is off the vehicle that makes sense
Ulf: agree with you
Ted: on high level we should be consistent with RPC as well, will ping Mangus F on that
Gunnar: I had an open question on key management but agree we should try to line those up - should be similar with RPC
… need to implement it and try it out
Ulf: I implemented in our reference implementation for VISSv2
Ted: we should do some hands on and get wider review from W3C security experts and elsewhere
Gunnar: raised with GENIVI security team and potential summer project for student to test out
… they are looking to review concrete proposal