Meeting minutes
Admin
ben: identifiers meeting action still outstanding
Resolution: Agree minutes of last meeting
Party Identifiers
joshuaCornejo: discusses need to go beyond simple URI to identify parties
… refers to diagram circulated by email
… "permID" covers basic needs of an ontology, but probably need to support multiple ontologies and some kind of heirarchy
… also looked at "LEI"; also looks promising.
jo_: need optionality on choice of scheme, and a way of specifying which was chosen, plus some kind of default
… got response from LEI Foundation. They think LEI is suitable for our needs.
ben: contract vs policy - stick to policies for now in first draft, make decisions about how to model contracts later
… party identifiers - key need at this stage is a unique, unambiguous identifier.
… LEIs are attractive as most relevant organisations are likely to use LEIs in some way internally
… LEIs do not currently support a URN syntax, but that is a surmountable problem.
… invites comments from Caspar on use of LEIs
Caspar_MacRae: party identifiers could be agreed bilaterally between contracting parties and there will be some need to support internally devised identifier schemas
… discusses possible role for "template policies"
jo_: two ideas possibly conflated: representing ids and negotiating their representation. Let's focus on the first
joshuaCornejo: refers back to email and clarifies with example using CME; will publish multiple policy templates; parties agree specific contract scope which will need to refer back to policies (and versions of policy)
jo_: looking to keep scope managable.
ben: already support "complex" identifiers
jo_: when you say "context is LEI" how does that get resolved in some way?
ben: CME globex example: use MIC and refer to relevant ISO standard
mark_bird: generating and consuming systems must have mapping logic embedded for supported identifier schemas
ben: will need to namespaces for identifier schemas
Caspar_MacRae: but don't want to be responsible for the namespace
jo_: responding to query from Mark; should be reasonably easy to get LEIs if needed.
Action: Mark to try to obtain an LEI and report back on the experience next call (hopefully)
<ben> DataBP: https://
Action: Ben to take discussion and make it a proposal to being back next meeting
Slots at FISD
ben: David Anderson prefers 90 minute format
… 15 mins demo/overview
… 40 minutes panel discussion
… 30 minutes Q&A
… prefers Q&A over Zoom, not chat.
… best to use pre-recorded demos (keep to length better)
… try for 5 minute version of consent demo?
… asks JPM if they have a re-usable demo
NigelP: will check with Ilya
ben: lists confirmed panel participants. Looking for sceptical but open minded participant and exchange representation.
… also need a moderator
… 3pm UK time 24th June
Editors' Update
mark_bird: three topics need review as discussed over email.
Laura: will take Activities and Actions
Caspar: will take Parties
mark_bird: will cover Resources
… comments from others in any area definitely invited.
jo_: reiterates last point (collective responsibility)
Feedback Review
<jo_> (put back to next session)
AOB
<jo_> thanks for Scribing, Nigel
<jo_> --- meeting closed ---
@jo_ no problem.