14:55:43 RRSAgent has joined #md-odrl-profile 14:55:43 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/05/12-md-odrl-profile-irc 14:55:45 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:55:46 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), jo_ 14:56:08 Meeting: Rights Automation Community Group Teleconference 14:56:13 chair: Jo 14:56:21 regrets: Renato 14:56:58 Agenda: https://w3c.github.io/market-data-odrl-profile/agendas/md-odrl-profile-agenda-2021-05-12.html 14:57:16 present: jo, ben 14:57:42 regrets+ Chris C, Ilya S 14:58:09 nods back as he sips his tea 14:59:36 s/nods back as he sips his tea// 15:02:01 joshuaCornejo has joined #md-odrl-profile 15:02:35 mark_bird has joined #md-odrl-profile 15:03:18 present+ jeremy, marko, laura, andy, emily, josh, mark 15:04:17 Caspar_MacRae has joined #md-odrl-profile 15:04:19 pressent+ caspar 15:05:09 NigelP has joined #md-odrl-profile 15:05:40 present+ nigel 15:06:46 scribe: nigelp 15:06:57 Topic: Admin 15:08:21 ben: identifiers meeting action still outstanding 15:08:23 RESOLUTION: Agree minutes of last meeting 15:08:24 Laura has joined #md-odrl-profile 15:08:54 Topic: Party Identifiers 15:09:35 present+ paulk 15:10:54 joshuaCornejo: discusses need to go beyond simple URI to identify parties 15:11:24 ... refers to diagram circulated by email 15:12:39 ... "permID" covers basic needs of an ontology, but probably need to support multiple ontologies and some kind of heirarchy 15:13:44 ... also looked at "LEI"; also looks promising. 15:14:54 jo_: need optionality on choice of scheme, and a way of specifying which was chosen, plus some kind of default 15:15:52 ... got response from LEI Foundation. They think LEI is suitable for our needs. 15:16:49 ben: contract vs policy - stick to policies for now in first draft, make decisions about how to model contracts later 15:17:42 ... party identifiers - key need at this stage is a unique, unambiguous identifier. 15:18:23 ... LEIs are attractive as most relevant organisations are likely to use LEIs in some way internally 15:19:10 ... LEIs do not currently support a URN syntax, but that is a surmountable problem. 15:19:55 ... invites comments from Caspar on use of LEIs 15:21:40 Caspar_MacRae: party identifiers could be agreed bilaterally between contracting parties and there will be some need to support internally devised identifier schemas 15:22:30 ... discusses possible role for "template policies" 15:24:36 jo_: two ideas possibly conflated: representing ids and negotiating their representation. Let's focus on the first 15:25:25 present+ olga 15:27:24 joshuaCornejo: refers back to email and clarifies with example using CME; will publish multiple policy templates; parties agree specific contract scope which will need to refer back to policies (and versions of policy) 15:28:00 jo_: looking to keep scope managable. 15:28:35 ben: already support "complex" identifiers 15:29:46 jo_: when you say "context is LEI" how does that get resolved in some way? 15:30:33 ben: CME globex example: use MIC and refer to relevant ISO standard 15:31:42 mark_bird: generating and consuming systems must have mapping logic embedded for supported identifier schemas 15:33:58 ben: will need to namespaces for identifier schemas 15:34:31 Caspar_MacRae: but don't want to be responsible for the namespace 15:35:23 jo_: responding to query from Mark; should be reasonably easy to get LEIs if needed. 15:37:09 ACTION: Mark to try to obtain an LEI and report back on the experience next call (hopefully) 15:37:30 DataBP: https://permid.org/1-5077895275 15:38:11 ACTION: Ben to take discussion and make it a proposal to being back next meeting 15:38:49 Topic: Slots at FISD 15:39:15 ben: David Anderson prefers 90 minute format 15:39:29 ... 15 mins demo/overview 15:39:48 ... 40 minutes panel discussion 15:39:57 ... 30 minutes Q&A 15:40:13 ... prefers Q&A over Zoom, not chat. 15:41:43 ... best to use pre-recorded demos (keep to length better) 15:42:29 ... try for 5 minute version of consent demo? 15:43:08 ... asks JPM if they have a re-usable demo 15:43:22 NigelP: will check with Ilya 15:44:19 ben: lists confirmed panel participants. Looking for sceptical but open minded participant and exchange representation. 15:44:25 ... also need a moderator 15:46:29 ... 3pm UK time 24th June 15:48:15 Topic: Editors' Update 15:49:51 mark_bird: three topics need review as discussed over email. 15:50:17 Laura: will take Activities and Actions 15:51:09 Caspar: will take Parties 15:51:27 mark_bird: will cover Resources 15:52:01 ... comments from others in any area definitely invited. 15:52:29 jo_: reiterates last point (collective responsibility) 15:53:46 Topic: Feedback Review 15:54:08 (put back to next session) 15:54:20 Topic: AOB 15:55:12 thanks for Scibing, Nigel 15:55:21 s/Scibing/Scribing/ 15:55:32 --- meeting closed --- 15:55:33 @jo_ no problem. 15:55:50 NigelP has left #md-odrl-profile 15:55:51 scribeopts: -nodraft -oldstyle 15:56:01 rrsagent, make minutes 15:56:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/12-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html jo_ 15:56:35 rrsagent, make logs public 15:56:59 rrsagent, make minutes 15:56:59 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/12-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html jo_ 15:58:28 s/scribeopts: -nodraft -oldstyle// 15:58:59 scribeoptions: -oldStyle -nodraft 15:59:06 rrsagent, make minutes 15:59:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/12-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html jo_ 16:08:38 s/pressent+ caspar// 16:08:45 present+ caspar 16:12:00 rrsagent, make minutes 16:12:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/12-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html jo_ 16:38:49 ben has left #md-odrl-profile 18:26:11 Zakim has left #md-odrl-profile