<wseltzer> plh: director expects an updated implementation report before move to Rec
<wseltzer> ... if we have testable assertion in the spec, get tests into WPT
<wseltzer> ... Do we have tests for the new high-level features as described in CR transition
<wseltzer> agl: when chromium implements, we add web platform tests
<wseltzer> ... so those we implement should have tests
<wseltzer> plh: it looks as though we have tests for all but attestation
<wseltzer> sbweeden: we've tested but not in automated manner
<wseltzer> agl: enterprise attestation tests woudl require webdriver changes
<wseltzer> plh: please provide info in response to my email
tony: suggestions comments on charter?
… anymore, I can get it together and push it out
… ok, some issues to look at
jeffH: charter, we do have a label for feature proposal, we likely have to put all issues in.
… update credential metadata
… issue #\1200
… also #14560 from D.Waite
dwaite: push is to have RP take responsibility.
… i don't have a solution; kicking off discussion
tony: need some general terms to define problem
jfeffH: RP driven cred cleanup
agl: this is an enterprise thing.
… we may have a mechanism to use with this.
tony: back to https://
… this is for L3?
… get around in L2
jeffH: do we need to think about this somemore.
tony: where do we put it>
we are back at https://
agl: we could say deletion of creds
jeffH: sounds good
… blob and web driver
jeffH: it's a PR
jeffH: looks like a cleanup for L3
jbradley: they want to do remote bio-metrics and layer on web authn
… we don't do that, or maybe that is done under a separate API
agl: you mean biometrics off device?
agk: biometrics don't leave the device
jeffH: they show they are at odds with FIDO principless
jbradley: who wants to close this.
akshay: back to #1580
nsteele: we can suggest not do it.
tony: can put verbiage in the document
dwaite: we should say something about this proposal.
jbradley: fido is clear you can't do biometric off the device
nsteele: will come down to browsers and hardware
akshay: we may want to look if we need something more; let's leave it open
tony: we can make an issue if we need to.
elundberg: #1587 I missed some of that.
tony: didn't miss it