18:30:58 RRSAgent has joined #webauthn 18:30:58 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/03/24-webauthn-irc 18:31:00 RRSAgent, make logs Public 18:31:01 Meeting: Web Authentication WG 18:31:44 wseltzer has changed the topic to: 24 March https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2021Mar/0097.html 18:31:47 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2021Mar/0097.html 18:58:13 jfontana has joined #webauthn 18:59:54 matthewmiller has joined #webauthn 19:00:27 present+ 19:01:10 present+ 19:01:41 jericks has joined #webauthn 19:01:42 dveditz has joined #webauthn 19:01:51 present+ 19:04:48 present+ plh 19:06:07 plh: director expects an updated implementation report before move to Rec 19:06:25 ... if we have testable assertion in the spec, get tests into WPT 19:07:03 ... Do we have tests for the new high-level features as described in CR transition 19:07:15 plh has joined #webauthn 19:07:22 agl: when chromium implements, we add web platform tests 19:07:28 ... so those we implement should have tests 19:08:17 nsteele has joined #webauthn 19:08:25 present+ 19:08:31 present+ plh 19:10:58 plh: it looks as though we have tests for all but attestation 19:11:14 sbweeden: we've tested but not in automated manner 19:11:36 agl: enterprise attestation tests woudl require webdriver changes 19:13:10 plh: please provide info in response to my email 19:19:25 present+ 19:21:06 tony: suggestions comments on charter? 19:21:32 ...anymore, I can get it together and push it out 19:21:39 ...ok, some issues to look at 19:22:12 jeffH: charter, we do have a label for feature proposal, we likely have to put all issues in. 19:22:27 ...update credential metadata 19:22:37 ...issue #\1200 19:22:50 ...also #14560 from D.Waite 19:23:04 correcrtion #1560 19:23:45 dwaite: push is to have RP take responsibility. 19:24:18 ...i don't have a solution; kicking off discussion 19:24:31 tony: need some general terms to define problem 19:24:45 jfeffH: RP driven cred cleanup 19:27:16 agl: this is an enterprise thing. 19:27:41 ...we may have a mechanism to use with this. 19:28:35 tony: back to https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1586 19:28:43 ...this is for L3? 19:28:47 ...get around in L2 19:29:10 jeffH: do we need to think about this somemore. 19:29:19 tony: where do we put it> 19:30:22 we are back at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1560 19:30:35 agl: we could say deletion of creds 19:30:39 jeffH: sounds good 19:30:48 tony: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1586 19:31:01 ...blob and web driver 19:31:06 jeffH: it's a PR 19:31:40 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1587 19:32:11 jeffH: looks like a cleanup for L3 19:32:36 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1580 19:33:06 jbradley: they want to do remote bio-metrics and layer on web authn 19:33:24 ...we don't do that, or maybe that is done under a separate API 19:33:35 agl: you mean biometrics off device? 19:33:40 jbradley: yes 19:34:36 agk: biometrics don't leave the device 19:34:45 correction: agl 19:35:53 jeffH: they show they are at odds with FIDO principless 19:35:57 q+ 19:36:20 q- 19:36:24 elundberg has joined #webauthn 19:37:32 jbradley: who wants to close this. 19:38:25 akshay: back to #1580 19:38:39 nsteele: we can suggest not do it. 19:38:55 tony: can put verbiage in the document 19:42:04 dwaite: we should say something about this proposal. 19:44:33 jbradley: fido is clear you can't do biometric off the device 19:44:42 ...authenticator 19:46:11 nsteele: will come down to browsers and hardware 19:46:48 akshay: we may want to look if we need something more; let's leave it open 19:46:56 tony: we can make an issue if we need to. 19:48:00 elundberg: #1580 I missed some of that. 19:48:13 tony: didn't miss it 19:48:27 s/1580/1587/ 19:49:21 rrsagent, draft minutes 19:49:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/24-webauthn-minutes.html wseltzer 22:41:12 nopin has joined #webauthn