Scribe, rrsagent, agenda check, confirming next meeting, present+
jb: Any additions for the agenda?
jb: Asks for any regrets for 24 March?
jb: Could be me--but wanted to check. I'll be here.
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to note APA availed joint mtgs, but not APA only business
Reminder to your groups of upcoming daylight saving time changes
jb: Daylight Time starts Sunday in most of North America
jb: Asks whether any issues?
<Judy> ... and then two weeks later in Europe...
jb: Reminds usefulness to reinforce time change shortly before mtg. People forget
Is your AC rep aware of your work? Upcoming W3C AC meeting TPAC format input all set?
mc: Have localized time built into Zoom data pages
jb: Reminds of AC mtg in April -- W3C member reps
jb: Suggests updating AC reps with WAI work you're engaged in
WAI team doing some reflection on direction and priorities, input on technical and outreach issues?
jb: Expecting more in depth WAI Team priorities/direction discussion over coming weeks
jb: Wanting to give others an opportunity to raise issues for staff to reflect on ...
jb: This is looking forward over the next few years ...
<Rachael> +1 to a joint glossary. We see that in silver and coga too
bg: Recalls desire for WAI-wide glossary. We have need in various docs.
bg: Would be helpful to build into our docs by reference
rm: Looking for increasing emphasis on COGA, but also mental health. Not sure how it fits, but something to consider
js: Notes need for registry in some TF specs
jeanne: Need to make our tools more accessible, needs to remain a priority
jb: Notes regression in Doodle polling
jb: Asks for any tooling suggestions? Is this a good ongoing topic?
<Kim_patch> + Tools more accessible these to remain a priority
jeanne: Suggests license for Google, so we could have protected data in Googld Docs use
<Judy> JB: isn't that also partly inaccessible?
<Judy> JSp: depends on disability
jeanne: Notes have not found one tool that fits all; even within disability category
jn: Aren't there also geographic restrictions in Google Docs
kd: Switching around is tough for speech input
<jeanne> last I heard, there were. But if we let people with disabilities use the tools that they need to work in, and find the ways to make it work within W3C.
kd: Suggests starting with GD; and enabling transformation to other representations
<brent> Same as what Kim just said
kd: Speaks up for tools people are accustomed to using
Brent: New tools are always a learning process; Now we fractured because of so many tools in soo many orgs
jb: Don't expect a solution from brief discussion; but good to discuss
Brent: Maybe not solution, but perhaps more mangeable
<Zakim> jeanne, you wanted to affirm to continue to emphasize tooling
<Zakim> brent, you wanted to say familiarity
jb: Wonders whether there are priority issues that need broader discussion?
<Judy> s/where there are/which are the/
jeanne: Just what I'm working on; porting email comments into github issues
jeanne: have several hundred comments from all around the world
jeanne: have feedback through regular channels but also through intros to the FPWD that we're doing
jeanne: a bit overwhelming
jeanne: Encouraging is various regulatory comments; Mostly positive
jeanne: Still working on scoring
jeanne: Hopeful response from U.S. Trusted Testor and Access Board
jb: Requests heads up when working with AB
jeanne: Yes, invited back in June
rm: Continuing to explore conformance model and also interaction between the medals levels
rm: Comments have given us a direction for next months
jb: To what extent is conformance and testing the same? Related?
rm: Venn diagram
jeanne: mostly overlapping
jeanne: much of what is conformance has moved into scoring
Upcoming work and publications https://
www.w3.org/ WAI/ cc/ wiki/ WAI_Announcement_Drafts
jb: Latest time frame on Content Usable?
rm: In COGA CfC; APA next Wednesday; also survey at AG next week
rm: so maybe a few weeks
jb: Asks about coordination with Shawn on messaging?
rm: Lisa and Roy working on drafts
Reminder APA charter review
jb: Asks again if others would like to review?
<Rachael> I read it. I appreciate them keeping coga in
<janina> s/asks whether/can please confirm/
<Rachael> I think its this https://
Rescheduling meeting with Immersive captions for the Web CG (Captions in VR and AR)
jb: Has strong deaf community participation
jb: getting more interested in other WAI and W3C work
jb: Expressing interest in getting involved in other groups
jb: So, trying to reschedule this call
<Rachael> I can join depending on timing
jb: Looking for participants next Wednesday 17 March
<Rachael> Next Wednesday I can join at 12:30 EST
<brent> Any way to get the invite to join the meeting without "joining" the community group?
jeanne: Would like to connect more closely; captioning guideline is vector to indicate including XR in WCAG 3
jn: Like to join just for general interest; probably not much relevant to ARIA
<Zakim> jeanne, you wanted to ask for help with WCAG3 Captions from Immersive Captions
<brent> I am out all next week on vacation, but happy to join at a later time.
jb: Reminds APA about community group review
jb: Wondering any informal networking in virtual CSUN?
<brent> lazy commitment = "relaxed commitment"?? just an idea to pass along.
jeanne: axe-con has reasonable seminar tool: slido
jb: Were you able to interact with others in the session?
jeanne: There are active chat channels
jn: But many complaints, too