<LisaSeemanKest> ageda?
<LisaSeemanKest> and https://github.com/w3c/coga/issues
<LisaSeemanKest> scribe: fazio
LS: Good job Betsie
<LisaSeemanKest> https://github.com/w3c/coga/issues
LS: 200 issues to get through on
Github
... Need more participation in Editors calls
... 2 - 4 discussions each week over GitHub issues
... Read Approval Discuss method will be implemented to
streamline resolving issues
<Rachael> +1
<JustineP> +1
<stevelee> +1
<BetsyFurler_> +1
<LisaSeemanKest> +1
LS: Patterns need discussion
mine is done
LS: pattern authors need to be present during review of their pattern
<LisaSeemanKest> https://doodle.com/poll/rxitx58y3q4q3xmm?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
LS: Do 1 - 2 hour meetings a week sound reasonable to resolve issues?
<Rachael> Thursdays are good for EA, David can make a few hours most days but not all day any day
<kirkwood> will do!
<LisaSeemanKest> done
<LisaSeemanKest> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2020Nov/0033.html
Rachael: most changes are editorial
<LisaSeemanKest> https://github.com/w3c/coga/pull/226/files
<LisaSeemanKest> +1
LS: If more discussion needed please indicate
<_BetsyFurler_> +1
<JustineP> +1
<EA_> +1
LS: should use boiler plate response text to thank GitHub reviewers
<Rachael> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2020Dec/0009.html
Rachael: Meeting with EO is needd
LS: document restructure was requested. We opted to add references instead
SL: Does review of other sources need clarification?
<LisaSeemanKest> +1
Rachael: number of reviews would take 1 year
<stevelee> +1
<JustineP> +1 given that the document is non-normative
<EA_> +1
+1
<BetsyFurler_> +1
<kirkwood> +1
<LisaSeemanKest> https://w3c.github.io/wai-wcag-supporting-documents-redesign/
<LisaSeemanKest> https://w3c.github.io/wai-wcag-supporting-documents-redesign/2020-07-15-coga.html
LS: what should we add to Shadi's proposal if anything?
<stevelee> +1 to using side bar for links etc
I can't look now
+1
<LisaSeemanKest> john do u want to be on a call to discuss this?
Rachael: schedule time to review and discuss
send it in email
<stevelee> +1
<Rachael> +1
me
+1
EA: concerned about translation of right side into other cultures
Rachael: flexibility to January was implied
send invite I'll do my best
5 am here
830 mine
that's good for me
<kirkwood> sorry i cut off there lisa!
<kirkwood> yews
<kirkwood> yes
<kirkwood> :)
<kirkwood> no unfortnately
<LisaSeemanKest> 11.30 est monday
<LisaSeemanKest> ?
<kirkwood> yes
<kirkwood> actaully can reschedule the 9 that would work if necessary
<LisaSeemanKest> ack f\
<LisaSeemanKest> icons at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aRoYev1aAIHhIq37Itt96ueBwLh5zXMUeJBYxL0MCkQ/edit
can someone take over scribe? I need to get ready to leave
<Rachael> scribe: rachael
<LisaSeemanKest> +1
<Fazio> thx
Lisa: Approval request for icons
at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aRoYev1aAIHhIq37Itt96ueBwLh5zXMUeJBYxL0MCkQ/edit
... Are they going to do the ticks and X?
Justine: I thought we had decided to scrap that idea.
Lisa: I would like one but how
does everyone else feel?
... a tick by the good examples and an X by the bad ones. Does
everyone agree with an icon by the Dos and one by the
avoid?
<LisaSeemanKest> +1
+1
<EA_> querying three fingers as being acceptable in all countries?
<EA_> or just mistaken for meaning more than three
Lisa: Good point.
Justine: I can look into it.
Lisa: Been adopted by some protestors
<EA_> what about a dice with three dots
Lisa: Any other comments?
<EA_> it is used in communication symbols for numbers
<LisaSeemanKest> =>
Lisa: You could have 3 dots on a
dice but three fingers may be easier to understand.
... We may also need and icon next to the What to Do
section.
... A check next to the Dos, An X next to the avoids.
... You would have an icon next to the What to Do to draw
attention to it. Does that make sense?
Rachael: I am concerned that too many icons may reduce the effectiveness of the icons.
Lisa: We have a how to do section
that would be between them. The most important thing is what to
do.
... then you scroll down. The most that would be on the screen
would be 3 icons.
Rachael: I woudl need to see it.
Lisa: Justine, can we ask for them?
Justine: I can. Can you remind me what we wanted for the Do and Avoid?
Lisa: Just a black and white tick
and X
... We have a follow on call. We will stay on this call.
<LisaSeemanKest> next meeting on this channel
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: Rachael, LisaSeemanKest, stevelee, JustineP, Fazio, joconnor Present: Rachael LisaSeemanKest stevelee JustineP Fazio joconnor BetsyFurler_ Regrets: roy ab i_jennie Found Scribe: fazio Inferring ScribeNick: Fazio Found Scribe: rachael Inferring ScribeNick: Rachael Scribes: fazio, rachael ScribeNicks: Fazio, Rachael WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 03 Dec 2020 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]